Show newer

Source:
Maturana H. R. & Guiloff G. D. (1980) The quest for the intelligence of intelligence. Journal of Social and Biological Structures 3(2): 135–148. cepa.info/555

Show thread

In we distinguish between three control functions (levels):
1️⃣ the purpose of which is maintaining the system's ,
2️⃣ for finding an optimal path (and way of utilizing the regulators) to fulfill a given , and
3️⃣ (governance) providing direction.

Show thread

Korzybski's famous remark that "the is not the " because people regularly confuse conceptual models of with reality itself, and its derivatives such as "all models are wrong" originates from regarding the as a or picture ***describing*** that reality.

The is instead a (instruction) or a for helping us navigate the terrain, what Maturana would call a with which each one of us is able to create our own image of reality depending on what we "want" from the terrain we are navigating through.

Dissolution,

"A of a problem proceeds by showing that the troublesome questions rest on ."

(2004) - "Why there is Something rather than Nothing"

>As business struggles to adapt to a rapidly changing world, managers are bombarded with a bewildering array of schemes for how to be a boss and make an organization tick. It’s tempting to be seduced by *futurist fantasies where every company has the culture of a startup, and where employees in wacky, whimsical office settings, liberated from hierarchies* and bosses that oppress them, are the foundation for breakthrough performance.
>
>***“Get real,”*** warn Nicolai J. Foss and Peter G. Klein. These fads ironically lead to micromanaging and, often, to disaster. Companies and societies, they show, need authority and hierarchy to coordinate work, including creative work. And, *counterintuitively, Foss and Klein illustrate how the creative use of authority and hierarchy helps companies to be more agile and flexible*, enabling educated, motivated people and teams to thrive.

google.ca/books/edition/Why_Ma

"The Turing test is not a good test for testing the supposed "intelligence" of an artificial system. This is well known in the Artificial Intelligence scientific community (I analyze this issue in my book “Cognitive Design for Artificial Minds”, Routledge, 2021). Trivially, one of the problems of the test concerns the fact that it is entirely "behavioral": that is, it looks only at the final behavior (the output) of a system without analyzing what are the mechanisms that led to that output."

Translated with: "Simple Translate" Extension for Firefox:
simple-translate.sienori.com/

, , ,

Antonio Lieto  
Una mia intervista divulgativa su #languagemodels e #chatgpt (in italiano) http://www.smarknews.it/smark/facciamo-chiarezza-su-chatgpt-limiti-pote...

is a necessary condition and comes before which is in turn necessary for the acquisition of :

>Language use is an aspect of human collective behaviour, and it only makes sense in the wider context of the human social activity of which it forms a part (*Wittgenstein, 1953*). A human infant is born into a community of language users with which it shares a world, and it acquires language by interacting with this community and with the world it shares with them.

Trying to "reverse engineer" intelligence from LLMs seems like a futile endeavor. Instead of , it may be more useful to redirect efforts to building ()

Show thread

When we say that
>we are asking the model to remind us of the lyrics of a well-known nursery rhyme, ... what we are really doing is asking it the following question:
>>Given the statistical distribution of words in the public corpus, what words are most likely to follow the sequence “Twinkle twinkle ”?
To which an accurate answer is “little star” 😀

arxiv.org/abs/2212.03551

@Harishjosev

Not just any kind of body. needs a body able to (re)#produce and maintain itself. That's why I believe we won't have until we figure out "" first.

@KeithJChouinard

For me it is the opposite. I see the ask for as pleading for from the bottom. "Do you understand me?" can be translated into "Do you support what I'm saying?"

The term , on the other hand, "sounds" more like . "Do you comprehend?" may be apprehended as "Do you have a good enough over all of this" so I can be sure you won't "screw up" something?😀

@bbak @kironbondale@mastodon.world @joeposaurus

Wasn't trying to start an argument. I just don't see anything questionable in using these terms for identifying different organizational cultures.

The term "culture" is used mainly to describe a set of values, beliefs, and behaviors shared among members of an organization, and those are often based on particular (known) frameworks, methodologies, or approaches like Scrum, Kanban, CMMI, ISO ...

Anyways, I think we've beaten this issue to death so I'll join you in wishing all the best in the New Year to all you good people. Have fun🎉

@bbak @kironbondale@mastodon.world @joeposaurus

If we can have names like "Gothic architecture" and "Christian religion" why is using "Kanban culture" as distinct from "Scrum culture" being controversial?
And yes, is very important for , state dependent (dynamical) systems.

@bbak @kironbondale@mastodon.world @joeposaurus

Where did you get the idea that I equate policies and culture?

Stories songs, and other documents are never just a description of the culture that created them. As you correctly identified, when they are accepted by the masses as a , they can be a powerful means for culture specific motivation and control (constraint).

In the end, it really does not matter if your organization is a , a , or some other . Every (people) organization is a with .

@bbak @kironbondale@mastodon.world @joeposaurus

Of course. A document that describes it is the of the . It is a form (means) of and of cultural traits. A kind of .

Instead of a written document, you may have a bard singing songs about the culture that would be fulfilling the same role.

@kironbondale@mastodon.world @joeposaurus

is what an will see as the interaction of the organization with its while I see as more of an thing.

Culture for sure affects the of the organization's behavior but, at the same time, it is quite possible that two different organizations with completely different internal cultures may exhibit the same or similar external behavior.

@kironbondale@mastodon.world @joeposaurus

Of course they can, have to, and will change. What I'm saying is that there is no need for a "special" organizational change process. It should all be part of a daily routine.

It is common knowledge though, that works best when there are in the process and that's hard to change something that is not properly documented. Changes done on someone's whim or "hunch" are the worst.

I see as nothing more than the organized collection of all the standard (written and unwritten) procedures an organization uses daily. That's the "living document" they pull out when they want to explain how they "do business here". It helps when there is at least an illustration or some other "hard" document that can be shared.

@kironbondale@mastodon.world @joeposaurus

Years ago, while working with a SW development organization, I was arguing that their SW development process is already structured as a . They just have to make sure they keep track, analyze, document, and possibly standardize procedures discussed in their daily meetings because that's where their organizational () is created and maintained.

@Harishjosev

Didn't "get it" even after being provided with hints. It seems to know a little bit more about VSM though.
In any case, I don't think you can expect any definitive answers or arguments from a "bullshitter" designed to please you by providing what it "thinks" you may want to hear 😀. At best, you can get an overview of the most common (mis)understandings of the matter you are inquiring about.

According to , is blocking the flow of from the (environmental) to the (internal, protected) . There are two primary forms of blocking the effect of the disturbance on the system:
1️⃣ Passive (by sheltering from), and
2️⃣ Active (on par with)
From:
W. Ross Ashby (1956) - An Introduction to Cybernetics, (Chapman & Hall, London) - available electronically from:
pespmc1.vub.ac.be/ASHBBOOK.htm

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.