@freemo
> you'd need some pretty advanced math..

i'm always fine with math. Idk for physics tho'. I never liked it.

Anyway.
for what i understand (from a lot of information that related to time dilation). People trying to prove time dilation using this analogy.

"A moving photon clock is moving slower relatively to the stationary one because they need to travel further distance and it would results in "time" being slower. Therefore time dilation is real"
(And photon clock aren't so different from any clock too. I can't remember the exact explanation. I'll re-visited my internet history to see if i still got it.)

I'm so bothered by this concept.
If there's indeed an accurate measurements of time i would like to know where to find it.
Until then, i consider "time dilation" that results to a "time travel" (if we're able to move at such high velocity, by that argument traveling back and forth in space would bring you to the future faster and freezing matter to a/near absolute zero would stop/slowed the object from experiencing time.)

@freemo
would you mind dropping some paper regarding "time is slowing down" later Mr. Freemo?
I'm interested since i can't find any video on youtube that mention any research regarding "time dilation". (I know. It's stupid to use youtube as your information source. But for what i can te you. Some channel are kind enough to link some paper related to the video topics).

@freemo @zpartacoos no. I never said General relativity bs Mr. Freemo. I said "time dilation" when basing it on "general relativity", when we don't know yet on how to accurately measure time without making the "measurements device" slows down.
Feel free to correct my missunderstanding and pardon my english, i'll occassionally rephrase my sentences.

Am i overthinking it?
Will this help our current research?
I'm being unproductive.
Help :blobcatverysad:

Show thread

Further note.
i agree, you will age slower. But that doesn't mean you can travel back in time. You just experience time differently because of every atom in your body and your environtment (that were moving relative to something) need to travel further distance.

Show thread

The whole "time travel" and "time dilation" when basing it on einstein general relativity are such a bs concept from my perspective ngl.
For what i know, the concept of so called "time" is that they were invented by "us", and we did the measurements based on the action done by an object we're observing.
Like when we decide in older times that a day = a night and a day,
As our measurements progress, we now decide that an atomic clock is our most "precise" measurements of time.
Note the "precise".
if the time itself is human relative.
And it will slows down when we move arround (look up "photon clock" and "einstein time dilation theory" for more detailed information.)
When in "reality" the "actual time" does not and hoping you can travel back in time using black hole as a medium or some whacky ideas is just sad.

Further note. Try not to think that reality (gravity, matter, etc) exist as in a "fabric", that's how most physicians told you when they themself knows that the word "fabric" are going to make a lot of missunderstanding (fabric = 2d? Get it?).
Gravitational force is 3d, that's why it will catch anything regardless of your relative position (up, down, left, right).

I'm open for someone to lecture me on this concept.

@CryptidEyez Happy birthday! I hope you had a good day! If it's not. Let's just hope for better day starting from tommorow.
Don't forget to be nice! :)
you'll be surprised by how many people you've made their day just because of your sweet attitude. :)

Don't mind me :)
I just randomly see this post last week and decide to congrulatulate you today.

Dee boosted
Dee boosted
> The number of custom emojis you use is correllated with how degenerate you are
- @manton
Dee boosted

Subpost 

@amolith i say they're too based to kept alive.
They're prodigy and government would do everything to prevents them spreading their influence.
Wake up peepole!!

@mc a visually impairment friendlg meme i see.
Vehhwy nice!

Good lord i remember how bad my physics score in highschool.
I hated it since the first day they taught me about vector, i can't understand a single fricking thing about it.
I still am. (not literally, since it's pretty much the same as geometry with some "fancy" stuff added, the thing that i definitely still remember about vector in physics is that my teacher would reject my answer just because i never put this stuff
{overrightarrow {AB}} = results
on the end line of my answer. I mean if i already put it on the first line it would mean it's the same case from the header - footer. maybe it's just my physics teacher being a bit of a "that guy" since my math teacher would accept my answer as long as i could explain to him how i got it, he would often tell me to switch with him too when he's just too busy grading our homework. idk, maybe it's just me being a bit of a c*nt because of how different their teaching methods.)

Show thread

@Acer i know it's a cool unique formula. But did you get the joke tho?

6 x 9 + 6 + 9 = 69
Coincidence? I think not

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.