Show newer

@hector I never made any claims that central banks or their tactics were good. I argued only the point that low but non-zero inflation is a good thing. There is quite a bit messed up about the current monetary system beyond that point.

@hector
Btw nothing i said has anything to do with keynesian economics btw. It is a concept that is accepted by virtually every model of economics there is simply because it is so obvious and easily verified.

@hector
Not really correct. The benefit of inflation is it encourages money to be invested rather than hoarded. This encourages wealth generation ad opposed to wealth stagnation.

The reason it tends to be more a burden on rich than the poor is the rich are more able to sit on money than the poor. But the difference is small

@wilmhit I'm not really sure. I wouldnt think so as wine components translate aindows API to linux/xorg apis more or less. So sticking them into a windows system somewhere makes no sense.

@wilmhit Well you could always just install linux without doing it "on windows" :)

@hector Actually inflation can help the poor or hurt the poor. It isnt as simple as you or the article might suggest.

As a general rule (though it is more complex than this) very slow and moderate inflation is good. Fast inflation, or worse yet hyperinflation is bad.

when inflation is good is more or less good for everyone. When its bad its more or less bad for everyone.

A healthy economy will be one with a fairly low, but >0 inflation rate.

@tripu The spanish are pros at training their olive trees to behave :)

@wilmhit yes.. here are the steps

1. install linux

2. take a windows CD and place it underneath your computer

3. install windows explorer

4. profit

@tripu This is the proper way to train a tree to sit. Notice how effective it is, the tree hasnt moved an inch!

@borko The "everyone is stupid including me" school of ethics is one I strongly support.

My warning signs for who not to get close to (and certainly don't date!):

1) If they always want to hang out with you, talk, or see you when they are single but you barely hear from them when they are dating someone.

2) Someone who doesnt want their significant other being close friends or hanging out alone with someone of the opposite sex.

3) Someone who is always in a relationship and when they are single is constantly looking for the next one. If they spent more of their lives with a SO than without, no go!

4) Anyone who thinks you are the best thing since sliced bread right after you meet them.

5) Anyone who tries to slip in stories or anecdotes that make them intentionally look like a desirable person and leave out the bad stories. The easiest way not to come across as attractive is to try to "sell" yourself.

6) Dishonesty of character, which relates closely to #5

I've put this on #reddit and it goes viral with 25k likes. #mastodon thank me later, my inbox has 500 questions about #fediverse and co.

Some help would be nice.
redd.it/qsbg5w

@DeveloperMemes

I want to see a programming language where keywords are meow, nya, suya, nini, *hugs*. It would look something like that

nya val = 5 //creates value meow fibo(val) { //creates function if val <= 1 { nini 1 // returns value } nya prev = val - 1 nya prev2 = val - 2 nini fibo(*hugs* prev) + fibo(*hugs* prev2) } nya result = fibo(*hugs* val) //pass by reference umu result //prints suya 10 //sleeps 10s

@Pat

Yes there are other reasons, but journals make it a point not to try to reject papers based on their conclusions, because then it isnt science anymore. Good journals are considered ones that dont try to dictate the narrative. As long as the data is good and the science accurate and up to date, they will usually accept conclusions that might disagree with the opinion of most scientists. Thats how we get new science.

Here is a good article explaining some of the reasons papers get rejected:

tressacademic.com/rejection-re

@icedquinn

@Pat

Sure. My point is simply that peer-review is not intended to decide if the authors conclusion is correct, only if the data they assert and the way they analyze it is correct. In other words, their job is to identify logical/mathematical errors from a purely objective standpoint. The commentary from the author is usually not too highly scrutinized.

What you cant do as a reader is go "Oh look the author concluded the color red is bad, and it passed peer review, therefore the color red is bad"

@icedquinn

@Pat

Case studies are individual peoples or groups of people (not randomly selected usually).. I'm talking about sampling (random selectrion from a large group) where the sample size is biased tot he point of not being able to do statistical analysis on it. A case study wont do statistical analysis at all, so thats fine, as opposed to doing statistical analysis on a group that is too small, thats not fine.

@icedquinn

@Pat

Yes, but crap usually means if the data is objective, and transparent, not if the conclusion is correct. For example a paper with a small sample size to the point that any data extrapolated would be within the margin of error is going to get rejected not for its conclusion but due to having poor data that makes it impossible to draw conclusions from at all.

@icedquinn

@Pat

Actually peer review does **not** verify the conclusions directly. What it will verify is any objectively stated figures in the conclusion. For example if they mention confidence intervals they will insure the CI stated matches the data. What they wont generally do is decide if the others opinion WRT how to interprit the data is correct or not. They cant as conclusions from data are opinion, it is only the data that is objective.

@icedquinn

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.