@customdesigned Amazon prime video running on a second monitor and me not realizing I put each monitor on its own card :)
Less exciting but I thought something similar (crypto mining though)
@freemo In your meme, they are destroying the money by burning it (not spending it). They are literally and irreversibly reducing the money supply, and hence inflation.
@customdesigned Oh I knew your point. I am just pointing out inflation effects are more complicated than just supply. If money is being stolen readily and easily en mass (one way tax can be interpreted) then that insecurity in holding money devalues the money in a way that is separate from supply itself. I think that deserves pointing out.
Its also important to note the subtle difference and relationship between wealth (the total utility) and money (a quantity is purely relative but often seen as absolute or fixed)
If the spending is wasteful and counter-productive it destroys wealth while keeping the money supply fixed. Burning money will reduce the money supply but have no net effect on the overall wealth. There are literally cases where burning the money may be better economically than spending it, but its more complex than to say money supply and inflation are the only major factors here.
Im beyond my own a bit too to be honest, this isnt my wheel house.
But I know enough to be dangerous, its really just simple logic, neutrons, when captured by atoms make them radioactive, the more they capture the more unstable.
When neutrons are just the right speed atoms will readily absorb them, but if they too fast they will speed past and not be absorbed until they slow down passing through stuff (which may be way overshoot). So by adjusting the speed of the neutrons you change how deep the absorption depth is, focusing more neutrons to be captured in a much shorter distance the slower they move.
combine these ideas and if you had a laser you could adjust the speeds you can concentrate all teh neutrons to be absorbed in a very shallow depth and cause a nuclear explosion at whatever you point it at.
Interesting tidbit: parafin wax is usually used to slow down neutrons to cause this effect, the term is a "neutron moderator"
Wooooaaaa... something n my computer has been using one of my GPUs for some sort of compute operation. Possibly for days now... Its definitely not for video since i have 4 water cooled compute optimized GPUs and only one of them does video. The tacymeter on the one pinging is one of the ones not hooked up to video.
What the fuck could possibly be compute processing on one of my GPU.... I mean usually its shit I wrote and run.....
Good old Bernie, its everyone's fault but him and his voters... funny that, its almost like blaming other people rather than taking accountability makes people happy.
Interesting fact of the day: While direct annihilation between two photons (light) is quite rare, the weak interactions between photons is not just noticeable but effects intergalactic light causing scattering. It only happens with high energy gamma rays but basically as they travel over galactic distances they interact with the "soup" of normal lower energy light traveling through he intergalactic void.
@peterdrake This reminds me actually of an idea ive played with in my head before. I dont think it has any real possibility in reality. But still cool to think about: Neutron lasers. While lasers arent really possible for bosons in any practical sense that I know of the idea of a focused long distance neutron beam, particularly if its energy level were adjustable to match the material targeting, would be a pretty decent explanation for sci fi beam weapons.
If you havent connected the dots it would cause whatever it is shot at to become increasingly heavy with neutrons and become unstable and if the beam was intense enough would basically just cause whatever it is pointed at to become a nuclear bomb that would explode as the neutrons accumulate int eh material.
Interesting fact of the day: Since a photon is its own anti-particle both matter and antimatter emit the exact same kind of light. They can still annihilate each other, they are just so weakly interacting such annihilation has never been experimentally observed, and we dont expect it ever will be, at least not anytime soon.
@lowqualityfacts I know you kid. But oddly (and this isnt as uncommon as you might think) but I sleep far better on adderall than off.
For those who are curious, I started Ozempic / Semiglutide at the beginning of January, Ive lost 10 lbs since the start of it, 14 lbs since it "kicked in". Attached are two charts, one of my weight since starting taking it, the other my weight as measured since January 2017, just to add some perspective.
@peterdrake hahaha love it!
I figure if we have Hydrogen we should also have drydrogen right?
@freemo I once wrote a space combat game where the weapons included electrino beams and poton torpedoes.
> These universal truths I describe are often incredibly narrowly defined, by necessity. I believe very few things are truly absolute, but there are a few.
The fact that you have to define them at all, let alone narrowly, make them non-absolute truths. They are only true under a definition, and thus circular... at best you are creating circular arguments with extra steps to obscure the circular nature of the argument. But its absolutely no different than 1+1=2 being true by definition, you are just using looser linguistic definitions rather thant he mathematical ones.
> These universal truths I describe are often incredibly narrowly defined, by necessity. I believe very few things are truly absolute, but there are a few.
The fact that you have to define them at all, let alone narrowly, make them non-absolute truths. They are only true under a definition, and thus circular... at best you are creating circular arguments with extra steps to obscure the circular nature of the argument. But its absolutely no different than 1+1=2 being true by definition, you are just using looser linguistic definitions rather thant he mathematical ones.
> For water, your quantity is not "1", but rather "blob". So, yes, blob+blob=blob, but none of those are integers. When they combine, it's not the math that changes, but rather the means by which you measure it. In different units, such as one gallon plus one gallon, the math holds true.
Blob is not a quantity, its a thing... You are acting like the question "How many blobs do I have" cant be "1".
The problem is "quantity" depends on "the quantity of what exactly".
blobs are measured in integers and yes 1 is a valid quantity of blobs. Blobs (like ducks) can also be measures in volume, in which case 1 m^3 + 1 m^3 = 2 m^3. But i wasnt measuring by volume, just as i didnt measurte by volume of ducks, i was measuring by unit, as we do with ducks.
If i make a duck into ground meat, and make it into sausage I can say "I have 1m^3 of duck meat" or I can say ""I have a pile of meat here that is 2 ducks of meat". Both are just as valid as the other.
> For water, your quantity is not "1", but rather "blob". So, yes, blob+blob=blob, but none of those are integers. When they combine, it's not the math that changes, but rather the means by which you measure it. In different units, such as one gallon plus one gallon, the math holds true.
Blob is not a quantity, its a thing... You are acting like the question "How many blobs do I have" cant be "1".
The problem is "quantity" depends on "the quantity of what exactly".
blobs are measured in integers and yes 1 is a valid quantity of blobs. Blobs (like ducks) can also be measures in volume, in which case 1 m^3 + 1 m^3 = 2 m^3. But i wasnt measuring by volume, just as i didnt measurte by volume of ducks, i was measuring by unit, as we do with ducks.
If i make a duck into ground meat, and make it into sausage I can say "I have 1m^3 of duck meat" or I can say ""I have a pile of meat here that is 2 ducks of meat". Both are just as valid as the other.
@freemo In none of those examples are you doing integer addition.
The first two examples are collision, not addition. The third is procreation, not addition.
One electron added to one positron is two physical things... until they collide, which kicks off annihilation (which is also not addition).
For water, your quantity is not "1", but rather "blob". So, yes, blob+blob=blob, but none of those are integers. When they combine, it's not the math that changes, but rather the means by which you measure it. In different units, such as one gallon plus one gallon, the math holds true.
These universal truths I describe are often incredibly narrowly defined, by necessity. I believe very few things are truly absolute, but there are a few.
Jeffrey Phillips Freeman
Innovator & Entrepreneur in Machine Learning, Evolutionary Computing & Big Data. Avid SCUBA diver, Open-source developer, HAM radio operator, astrophotographer, and anything nerdy.
Born and raised in Philadelphia, PA, USA, currently living in Utrecht, Netherlands, USA, and Thailand. Was also living in Israel, but left.
Pronouns: Sir / Mister
(Above pronouns are not intended to mock, i will respect any persons pronouns and only wish pronouns to show respect be used with me as well. These are called neopronouns, see an example of the word "frog" used as a neopronoun here: http://tinyurl.com/44hhej89 )
A proud member of the Penobscot Native American tribe, as well as a Mayflower passenger descendant. I sometimes post about my genealogical history.
My stance on various issues:
Education: Free to PhD, tax paid
Abortion: Protected, tax paid, limited time-frame
Welfare: Yes, no one should starve
UBI: No, use welfare
Racism: is real
Guns: Shall not be infringed
LGBT+/minorities: Support
Pronouns: Will respect
Trump: Moron, evil
Biden: Senile, racist
Police: ACAB
Drugs: Fully legal, no prescriptions needed
GPG/PGP Fingerprint: 8B23 64CD 2403 6DCB 7531 01D0 052D DA8E 0506 CBCE