Show newer

@TheOldGuy We should **not** be wasting resources bombing ISIS when there are much more important targets like Russia we should be bombing...

@JoMama87

Huh? I hate trump but this makes no sense. Without birthright melenia and his kids would still be citizens because Trump is a citizen and married to her, which would make both Melania and his kids citizens without birthright.

He is trying to eliminate anchor babies. People who are citizens because a parent or spouse is a citizen is not a path to citizenship he is blocking

@jaykuo

@jaykuo

This post makes no sense.. Trump was married to Milania and Trump is a citizen..

@ServersOnFire

You talking about biden, the guy who literally started his career with the goal to keep segregation alive so his child wouldnt have to go to school with minorities (in his own words)? That upstanding guy?

Yea sorry but while Trump is certainly a POS, biden can go toe to toe with him in POS factor any day of the week.

@unabomber

This was a 2022 letter where CEOs demanded gun controls, it had nothing to do with the recent murder.

Here is the actual article (notice the date):

cnn.com/2022/06/09/business/gu

@johnabs

It isnt what aboutism, its showing that Trump has a history of cutting back on spending or at least spending less in almost every category. I am not saying I like him, but arguably of the two choices when it comes to the issues listed here, here is by far the better one by a 4x difference.

@QasimRashid

@QasimRashid

> So—cut bloated Defense budget?
> MAGA: NO

Under Biden Harris Israel went from getting 3.4 billion a year to 12.5 billion a year to commit genocide. Under Trump he went the other direction, from 3.7 billion at the start of his reign to 3.4 billion at the end.

To put this more generally to numbers, under Trump the military spending went from 651 billion to 695 billion, an increase of 6.3% over his 4 years in office. By contrast under Biden military spending went from 695 billion to 886 billion, a whopping increase of 21.5%. Put in other terms that is a 191 billion increase under Biden and a 44 billion increase under Trump, in other words a huge 4.34x greater increase by Biden than by Trump.

@QasimRashid

> So—cut bloated Defense budget?
> MAGA: NO

Under Biden Harris Israel went from getting 3.4 billion a year to 12.5 billion a year to commit genocide. Under Trump he went the other direction, from 3.7 billion at the start of his reign to 3.4 billion at the end.

To put this more generally to numbers, under Trump the military spending went from 651 billion to 695 billion, an increase of 6.3% over his 4 years in office. By contrast under Biden military spending went from 695 billion to 886 billion, a whopping increase of 21.5%. Put in other terms that is a 191 billion increase under Biden and a 44 billion increase under Trump, in other words a huge 4.34x greater increase by Biden than by Trump.

@freeschool Those thinkers in trouble are in trouble largely because of how everyone else behaves to begin with. So yes, i do entierly blame people for that one.

@freeschool I think for the majority of the people it doesnt matter what a tarrif is. They simply hear "the other side proposed a thing therefore its evil". Thinking is not something americans do anymore.

Project QOTO needs you and your IDEAS! Interested? (More below) 

Welcome...

Project QOTO is to used to see how many users are interested in future projects by writing a simple "hello" message more visibly in this thread.

This thread helps us see who is motivated and what kinds of skills we have to work with, to then link the existing interests and ideas into future projects.

By not defining things too strictly from the beginning we allow ourselves to find out the answers (using ourselves) and show the positive attempts as we go. Welcome to Project QOTO.

There are no commitments with the "hello" message and you can remove that at any time.

If you have existing ideas for a project, or a "back burner" project or two , then please add that in a separate post or inside your own profile description for people to check out.

Use hashtag to check this thread at any time and see progress.

@freemo has confirmed this as a unofficial with his approval while he does other things meantime. For now we can see the ideas we have between us here, and use what social is really good for, bringing individuals together and forming whatever people like and love to do already and consider doing more of it!

regards,
(which includes you hopefully!)

Again, a simple "hello" is enough for people to see your profile and what you are already interested in.

@freeschool

Depending on what ideas you foster this may be relevant (this non-profit will also wind up as the home for QOTO I suspect):

qoto.org/@freemo/1136111677482

I will be kicking off a non-profit, funded from my main company, that will be another W3C, OpenGroup, ANSI/ISO and IEEE member. It will be a open-source incubator and focus on ethics in AI/AGI. As a member of standards organizations members will be able to contribute to existing standards and help us write and propose our own.

IF anyone is interested in being a member and by proxy being a member in the W3C, etc, just message me, we would love some volunteers who might be interested in helping out.

@stux

To what are you refering? The only one that comes to mind off hand is Elon's pump and dump BS he pulled in the past.

@randahl

Zoom in on these two pictures of her. Notice two dead giveaways... 1) the pupils of her eyes are not round, but rather are oddly shaped (almost rectangular) with a jagged edge. 2) notice that despite being able to see her freckles in both pictures that there is a very dominate and easy to notice freckle on her right cheek (from our perspective) in one photo that is complete absent in the other.

Even if you can handwave at #2 somehow, good luck explaining why she has an almost rectangular pupil with jagged edges....

@randahl

Ok I went to a bigger screen and zoomed in... Can 100% see proof it is AI now.

@randahl

Would be happy to discuss further. No rush.. I am doubting myself since the account is clearly fishy and fake.. im just not sure if the photos are real or an AI... no matter how hard i look im not seeing evidence of AI yet... yet....

@randahl

By the way i missed the part about the double face, ill answer it shortly im reading throught he feed now to find it and ill let ya know.

@randahl

I mean, I literally write AI for a living. So my point is, either this account wrote the best AI image generating software that we have ever seen, or it isnt AI... im going through her pictures looking for even a single artifact and im not finding any. Her damn freckles are even aligned perfectly.

@randahl

Doing a close inspection... even her wrinkles and freckle positions are identical... going to have to go with a solid no on AI here.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.