🎓 Doc Freemo 🇳🇱 @freemo@qoto.org

@zpartacoos Soooo... you changed your mind based on the words of the prosecution describing a video you didnt see? You dont think maybe the prosecutions interpritation is extremely bias and that you should take the time to watch the footage first rather than to just accept the words of the person who is legally obligated to be bias?

@namark

But hey maybe I'm asking to much for someone to be able to infer that a question posed by the admin of a STEM instance might actually be looking for a technical STEM-centric answer ::shrug::

What I do know is regardless, your little tantrums when people disagree with you is a disgrace and makes you look horrible, especially when its consistent and a daily problem with you.

@Pat

@namark

No not that you are out of place for using a loose and inconsistent definition of a hole. Only that your arguing that because you arbitrarily picked a definition that can not arrive at an answer you shouldnt be surprised you didnt arrive at an answer. And then complain the question is nonsense just because you picked the one definition that wont help you.

As I said before you can pick whatever definition you want, some will give you clear objective indisputable answers, others will give you noise with no answer. I really dont care what you go with per se.

But you are on a STEM server, if you cant infer that a question is asked technically on a STEM server, particularly when a non-technical definition wont arrive at an answer, then I dont know what to tell ya. What I do know is every word out of your mouth has been a waste of my time and could have been summarized as "If I pick the most general and useless definition I cant answer this"... sure, great, anything beyond that to argue your point is noise.

@Pat

@jojoisjustgay

I might have missed it.. what DM?

@Hyolobrika

@namark
Also nice try with the whole "I'm the victim because you called me out for being an asshole and insulting people, how dare you!"

@Pat

@namark

I never said they hurt my feelings, no they didnt hurt my feelings. My feelings are the issue, the issue is that your so emotionally insecure that you **try** to hurt my feelings anytime you are shown to be wrong, and not just mine you do it with everyone who ever disagrees with you on anything.

While my feelings might not be hurt I really have little interest in debating shit that a person is completely incapable of following along and evaluating maturely and just goes off on a hour tantrum everytime he is proven wrong on a point he cant defend logically... are my feelings hurt, no, is my time wasted by having to listen to you wine and have a tantrum instead of addressing the points raised against you, yes. So much so your attitude is the only relevant thing left because if it isnt addressed me and the rest of the server just sit here laughing at your tantrums and having out time wasted day in and day out.

@Pat

@namark

I never said they hurt my feelings. I said they made you the emotional equivelant of a 12 year old having a tantrum.. though I'd say probably closer to an 8 year old.

Big difference.

@Pat

@zpartacoos Do you have a link to the footage you are talking about. The only drone footage I have seen doesnt show what your saying. In the drone footage I saw kyle was already running from his assailant and only turned and aimed and shot once the person attacking him was at close range.

If you have ffootage of him aiming the gun at him BEFORE being chased that could change things. I'd like to see it.

@lain the only thing beyond fried chicken is deep-fried chicken.

@namark

"yet another thing that you are utterly incompetent at."

If you cant see how that is both rude and behaving like a school child having a tantrum then I simply cant help you.

Every day you seem to have a tantrum over someone disagreeing with you and instead of being an adult about it you just wail and name call... you are kind of the laughing stock of the server at this point, the child who thinks he is an adult and the only reason I protect you at all when reports come in time and time again is because even people with the maturity of a toddler deserve a voice.

@Pat

@namark

Not what i said, but then again like i said you are a bit brain dead when your wrong and start spewing nonsense... so ill just let you have yet another one of your little online tantrums like you do with someone new every day... keep going.

@Pat

@namark

I love how every time you are proven wrong three different ways your whole response is to ignore complete the arguments against you and just resort to name calling. What are you like 12?

@Pat

@namark

Keep in mind i also debunked very clearly your assertion in colloquial usage (natural language). You claim ac up has a hole but we dont say so because it is defined by its hole.

No one would look at a vollyball that has 75% of it cut away (a hole according to you, incorrectly) and say "that has a hole in it".. and in this case its exactly like the cup except you dont get the abilityto make the erroneous claim a volleyball is "Defined by its hole". Literally volleyballs arent defined by their hole and in this scenario no sane person would say there was a hole present.

@Pat

@Hyolobrika So you'd be better summarizing my stance as follows:

"you dont deserve to live" (notice the lack of qualifiers)

@namark

I understand that when a technical question is asked that expects an objective answer I expect people to know that they must rely on formal/technical definitions that are capable of providing objective and consistent answers.

You are welcome to use a non-rigorous definition and admit that using it there is no way to answer the question, thats fine. But dont sit here like an ass and insist a less rigorous definition is the only acceptable one. Rigorous definitions are just as valid and more importantly the only ones that arrive at an answer of any value here.

@Pat

@Hyolobrika Who said anything about smart people. Being smart doesnt prevent cancer. With no health insurance everyone dies including smart people.

@namark

Here you go, a math expert clearly explaining the formal/technical definition of a hole. He is reiterating exactly what I said and even goes over the exact examples we used:

https://youtu.be/ymF1bp-qrjU

@Pat

@namark

Apparently not enough of it as you dont seem to know the technical definition of a hole, which I already quoted earlier from a reliable source.

@Pat

@phil_s not exactly. population is defined by how many children they have **that live to child bearing age**.. so without healthcare more people die off before they can even have kids.

@namark

> How is hat even logic. The cup is a hole, and there is no hole?

No, a cup **is not a hole** and it also has no hole.

A tube has a hole because it meets the formal definition of a hole (it goes all the way through).. a cup has no hole because it does not meet the definition of a hole (it does not go all the way through).

Your problem is you are incorrectly defining a hole as an opening, which is not the technical definition of a hole.

@Pat