🎓 Doc Freemo 🇳🇱 @freemo@qoto.org

@louis From a casual observation there does appear to be a strong connection to the native language.

That said I vaguely remember some study that showed languages that produce sounds quickly do not correlate to greater information exchange. Basically all people exchange information largely at the same rate but in some languages that requires more "sounds per idea" than in others, those languages tend to sound like they are talking quickly.

@joeinwynnewood

In fact, you've done more to QED my original point of how the left is extremely toxic to criticism that blocking you would be counter productive. You're continued responses arer doing more to prove the very thing your arguing against than any response from me could have ever hoped to do.... why int he world would I block that, its gold!

@marcelias @HalfHeartedFanatic @gfjacobs @Burnt_Veggies @CoachMark @WrenArcher @kamalaharrisforpresidentnews

@joeinwynnewood

> Interesting that you felt it necessary to respond and that you think you're the one due an apology.

My mistake, I thought you were addressing me. Carry on then.

> Why don't you just block me?

Why would I do that?

> Seems like you need to continue to engage despite "not being interested in debating".

I never said you cant talk to me or engage in any capacity. I expressed a disinterest in talking about certain topics, no more, no less.

@marcelias @HalfHeartedFanatic @gfjacobs @Burnt_Veggies @CoachMark @WrenArcher @kamalaharrisforpresidentnews

@joeinwynnewood

> May I ask what you've done/are doing to move things in a direction where a Democratic Socialist could be someone with broad support?

You can ask. But after quite a few messages of you violating very clear boundaries I set it has soured me on wanting to have any conversation with you as it gives a clear indication it will be quite toxic and unrewarding for everyone involved.

If you'd like to apologize for your behavior, such as insults and personal attacks, and I feel that apology is sincere I'd be more than happy to make another attempt at engaging with you. But right now, you've convinced me there is no value in interacting with you.

@HalfHeartedFanatic @gfjacobs @Burnt_Veggies @CoachMark @WrenArcher @kamalaharrisforpresidentnews

@joeinwynnewood yes, to express an opinion that you think is wrong and a mischaracterization, and refusing to debate it further is absolutely respectful. Even if i happen to be wrong about my opinion there is nothing disrespectful about refusing to engage with someone who has behaved toxicly and given every indication it would be a waste of my time.

@joeinwynnewood LOL well it helps when you respect peoples boundaries and if someone says they dont want to engage, you dont.

Just having basic level of respect for peoples boundaries goes a long way when it comes to popularity. As you said, its certainly not my "performance" because I dont do much of that.

@gfjacobs @Burnt_Veggies @CoachMark @WrenArcher @kamalaharrisforpresidentnews

@medley56

Good point, put those little things where you have to pay 25 cents to use the toilets!

@Teri_Kanefield

@Teri_Kanefield So you are arguing kids should have to pay to use toilet papers in public schools... interesting proposal :)

@Ambulocetus

Apology for what exactly?

@xdydx

We have had an electorial college for the history of the USA and yet we have had third-parties take over as majority parties 8 times in history (7 times where the change was long lasting). So clearly we have historic examples to show this is false.

@beccanalia @CoachMark @WrenArcher @kamalaharrisforpresidentnews

@beccanalia

sleep well.

@godofbiscuits @CoachMark @WrenArcher @kamalaharrisforpresidentnews

@beccanalia

> Wrong. Your vote IN ADDITION to millions of other votes MATTER.

IU never said your vote doesnt **matter**... i said your vote wont cause any different outcome to occur if you vote priumary party, but CAN have a positive impact if you vote third party... What "matters" is a philosophical thing, I care about action and effects. The effect of my action of voting red or blue is that it effects no change of any kind, whatever decision I make the outcome is the same. In contrast the effect of my action of voting third party is a positive effect (as I descrived in my lead in) regardless of who wins the actual election or if i effect it.

@godofbiscuits @CoachMark @WrenArcher @kamalaharrisforpresidentnews

@godofbiscuits @CoachMark @WrenArcher @kamalaharrisforpresidentnews > First off, 80 years is more like FOUR generations.

True usually when people talk about generations they talk about the time to average child bearing age, not the length of time of a lifetime. What I meant here was a single persons lifespan.

> Second, the last non Democratic, non Republican President was Millard Fillmore

To be clear here I didnt actually answer your question, because I misread it as being applicable to my claim.

I claimed the majority party changed 8 times and the last time was 80 years. That is **not** the same as saying a non-majority party won all those 8 times. Some of those 8 cases represent presidential wins, some of them simply represented a new majority party pushing out an old, but not corresponding with a presidential win during that year (and by some future point when the new party does win has now been established as a majority party so wouldnt count by your criteria).

Specifically in the case of 80 years ago, we are talking about a third-party becoming one of the two majority parties, but not becoming the winning party,. 80 years ago was also the one time out of 8 that I had mentioned that the thuird party did not retain majority status after wards. In all other cases, 7 of them, the new majority party remained a majority party and I beleive in all cases eventually had a presidential candidate in office.

@CoachMark @WrenArcher @kamalaharrisforpresidentnews

@beccanalia @CoachMark @WrenArcher @kamalaharrisforpresidentnews > She owns up to it and stands by that decision.

Exactly, which is why she is an absolute disgusting human being. If she actually apologized and recognized it and many of her decisions were wrong, if she showed an ounce of humility she might have stood a chance with me.

> However, she is STILL accepted by the LGBTQ community and is WELCOMED as a POTUS candidate.

The fact that an abusee praises their abuser isnt an argument that will hold much weight with me. Also speaking about the LGBT community as if its a monolithic thing with a single opinion is just not accurate. I certainly know some LGBT who support her, and an huge number who dont as well. Most who support her I find buy into the 2-party system myth rather than due to actually liking her (most of the time).

> Her history of LGBTQ support reaches back to 2004 -- earlier & more constant than Pres. Obama's at that time.

Her "support" is words, her actions shows very much the contrary.

> This is a good article about her history with the LGBTQ community and issues that concern them the most: https://19thnews.org/2020/08/kamala-harris-complicated-lgbtq-choice/

Does this aerticle contain only praising references or does it include a mix of both her good points and her mistakes? I dont mind reading an article but based on how you talk it sounds more like its going to be a propaganda piece and ill be wasting my time listening to someone tell me why I should be as bias as they are and find nothing wrong with her of any kind. If the report is honest and includes good and bad in an actually objective sense, then ill be happy to read.

@CoachMark @WrenArcher @kamalaharrisforpresidentnews

@beccanalia @godofbiscuits @CoachMark @WrenArcher @kamalaharrisforpresidentnews > There is absolutely no value to a third party vote when US democracy hangs on the line and the margins of winning are so very narrow.

And yet, unless that vote comes down to a single vote, the choice of vote I make will have absolutely no change in the winner. So while a vote for a major party wont have any net positive good, a vote for a third party would, regardless of if they win (for the reasons I previously explained).

> For, indeed, Biden won some states in 2020 by mere thousands of votes. Every vote counts.

And yet even if i was one of those "mere thousands" of votes that Biden won his margin by... even then no matter who I voted for would not have changed if Biden won, thus produced no net good.

> As you're living in the Netherlands, you have no skin in the game re who wins the WH and re the perpetuation of US democracy.

No as I explained I live in the USA and the Netherlands, until recently also Israel. Right now I spend more time in the USA than the netherlands as this is where my company is.

> Have you read PROJECT 2025? It's a promise.

Yea, I am aware of the project, I know it was done without any input from Trump (supposidly) and Trump has denied any connection with it. That said I I would expect him to do things as bad or worse. Which is why its a good thing I am 1) voting against him and 2) ensuring my vote focuses on tearing down the 2 party system in the hope that once we accomplish that we will never see another person like Biden or Trump again.

@godofbiscuits @CoachMark @WrenArcher @kamalaharrisforpresidentnews