Show newer

Social being driven by people / Dedicated Development of People (not just software, tech news, bad leaders, not just memes or 1 replies)... People together improving communication... 

@mike Wow that's maybe what I did too in a , but from a "social dream" point of view which I think is what people today need.

Not just software but "social" actively being a social thing.

Not waiting for Trump to take over more and spending time on that hashtag instead of hashtag).

So I'd like to personally see these points happen please :)

♦️ Not just , but (people driving their social software if they want to make real change / even more ).

So for Mastodon they would have a department of people / volunteers - weekly / monthly meet ups about whatever interest is found in shows up (and let them take stage for 5mins in instant Jitsi chat as quickest way to chat).

or

♦️ Not just "developing" Tech
actually developing better people !

(I can see a 👕 in these phrases I haven't see here before or can't remember last time)

➡️ of my genuine story is:

We have enough tech now
()

We just need more actual social
( audio chat, not just a bit more advanced than a text and only notepad 📓 world)

All said positively... with and please Techies, socialise about human things not machines.

Imagine this a bit of a letter... we need people and less machine (nowadays)

You did well before, thank you.
⌚ Time for people as social. Give and receive their time.

At the Green Party conference in Bournemouth we agreed to:

🏚️ Abolish landlords (the daily Mail are loving that one)
💻 Repeal the online safety act
🚂 Electrify the new varsity line
🇵🇸 further toughness re the Palestine war - against the Blair/Trump plan
🦡 end badger culling
🏳️‍⚧️ reform trans healthcare
🌍 climate strategy, natural habitat network
🌳 global biodiversity framework targets
🎈 stop all outdoor balloon releases

Plus a big bunch of internal organisational stuff. Absolutely delighted! 💚

Sending U.S. troops from one state into another state crosses a very bright line: it is an even more glaring violation of the invaded state’s sovereignty than what Immergut called out, which was the unlawful federalization of troops already stationed within a state. The vitally important difference between two is that using troops from outside one state to invade another is simply the start of using the entire U.S. Army against any one state. 8/

@FediThing They want to control the internal operations of every individual state in the country, stop holding meaningful elections, and preserve wealth and power for white Christian men up and down a hierarchy of control.

Unfortunately, the most competent lawyers and judges cannot flat out stop a rogue President from using military force against American civilians. And the difficulty is compounded by having a suspect U.S. Supreme Court prepared to decree by fiat rather than law that this rogue President may do whatever he pleases. That said, every lawyer and judge that tries to use the law to stop Trump has my respect.

Human Attachment systems meets Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. Each stage has a corresponding attachment figure. Interesting.

by @heidipsychology
instagram.com/p/C7b9cYusp6H/

Few points - Lines with arrows are the header points / short version 

@Photo55 @georgemonbiot.bsky.social

Few points - Paragraphs with arrows are the header points and short version (can skip non-arrow points)

➡️ I think the real world is determined and constructed by those types with their default perspectives of war by - Governments and groups especially - all towards conflict or battling on people rather than with them (home or away as the battle / against everyone - never with them unless it's more which is longer / unseen damage / extraction / business. All the same.

====================
More below or skip to next arrow ➡️ to see next header.
or continue deeper...
====================

So it's part of the same thing not so separate even if they find themselves in another war - even that is not by chance.

Imagine 'these' countries all doing with for gas - knowing how bad they were from before and now hardly willing to fight or condemn them. that's what you get for jumping in bed for so many years with bad controllers of that country.

And they knew / know it.
Impossible they didn't know who they were funding and building a pipeline to / from and building a fragile civilisation upone that destined to die when inevitable trouble starts (again).
=================

➡️ Government's main directives are directly against the people (even if it's seen through public's eye of as "helping" but really still doing more of the same) IT IS USED TO PROFIT FROM THEM,
RAW PROFIT, NOT CARING AS THE BUSINESS MODEL!

====================
More below DEEPER or END HERE.
====================

⭐ Knowing and expecting that main thing is ESSENTIAL to not using or trusting them more. ⭐

and so....

🔴 ultimately power to itself and not people

🔴 profit over people

🔴 always going to put itself first

🔴 use even hospitals for that same thing (economic , profit, human energy extraction)

🔴 make sure it just tightens these thigns over time (I think history proves this)

and we cannot expect Government or rich or powerful to EVER give up that in favour of people as that naturally goes against directives / power construct.

♦️ I think we have to accept that we literally have to do it ALL OF IT OURSELVES () and can't trust or invest any more.

Re-do relationships from me and you so those politics are clearer and nearer than 'those' politics (distant, taking money, uncontrolled ETC)...

Take out losses and re-do intelligence between the people...

How many times people have to be lied to and stolen from more brutally depends, but I feel it's all self-evident and even if we still need them on this tangent created, we can use them less and increase out own personal politics and understandings more.
This is why gets support - might not be the answer but is example of because you know the bad you're always getting with Gov setup almost being copied and pasted like a sick dog meme and people still complaining about it or about another president.

Just have to do it yourself. And talking about it AND building best you can helps.

Well that's the trouble. We did. We voted out the Tories, only to get a government that now does the same or worse. It's not hard to see why people feel like giving up on politics.

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:xpwel3im6lpkm77ujhsqc6ck/post/3m2h22bw4322s

@rabbit74 @wjmaggos
human_powered: Yeah To say:
" 'One click' is insidious... " seems a bit harsh but I'm sure it is true in many contexts also...

❓ Could you give some examples of less clicks being bad...

❓ and how Web Navigation requiring more clicks is getting more interesting?

#Napster and #Spotify similarities / relativity... 

has a fan from Sweden, Daniel Ek who was fascinated by the ‘all you can play’ experience offered by file-sharing software and planted the seeds for , the streaming startup where he still serves as CEO today...

AND did or does file-sharing of the music under the hood to relieve the load through it's users!

torrentfreak.com/napster-spark

P.S Why does the name Spotify work so well when it's not so literal or connected to anything existing - even sounding like a cleaning advert - but works as a 'have you go spotify' not that I use it.

Creative Commons licenses #CC0 or CC-SA-NC ... 

@JessTheUnstill is open work but might be commercialised...

Just making sure to check this as "opposite" in wht you said might seem to say opposite in various spectrums;

So you maybe mean:

1/ but just to confirm this allows commercial usage...

or

2/ CC-SA-NC
⬆️ Big difference:
CC = Creative Commons
SA = Share alike
NC = non-commercial

(and no need for "BY" = you didn't want attribution)

This might be easiest way to see:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative

Fascism - different types like Financial Fascism (more subtle but still just as bad / perhaps worse) 

@JessTheUnstill Ok not asking for it here but I am asking (so please don't confuse to start with - are we ok on that?)
Having a big sign is good - slightly loud but I wanted to say there's also a kind of financial fascism goes on and without talking long about it, I was wondering if you're hear me out without risk of banning / blocking / calling me names towards really showing there is a part of fascism in most people (can accept the very clear stuff but there is a WHOLE load of 'other' which I feel people trip into or trip others in while explaining)...

The subject would cover basics of working with and for State and Banks... ok actually maybe that is it and can you make from that something agreeable along the lines of fascism and forcing others to be (some more than other but many who believe State or Banks are straight?)

Thanks for your time

@JessTheUnstill [whispers] AOL dialup has just been switched off. Eternal September is over. Usenet prevails! :blobfoxwink:

⭐ "That it doesn't solve all possible problems is not a valid criticism. " ⭐
by tom jennings @tomjennings


I like this quote a lot as goes through all .

Best quote for this month I'm sure...

@JessTheUnstill @dlakelan @VeilidNetwork There's apparently an anti-abuse piece of Signal that is closed source so as not to make sidestepping that too easy. A signal fork would need an equivalent.
signal.org/blog/keeping-spam-o

And yes, the signal server repo is open source and recently active.

Show older

#FreeSchool=Learning Together's choices:

Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.