Show newer

I never thought I could hate Microsoft more than I already did, and yet my school's IT administrators have managed to make the impossible possible.

I hate dealing with telecom companies.

My first book chapter/(conference proceedings for a conference I didn't know was a conference???) is out today! Not my first peer-reviewed paper, but definitely the first that went into a book 😁

The title is "Systematic Review of Inclusive Design via Neuroergonomics as Assistance for Atypical Neurology"

The book is here, my article/chapter is at the end of the first page (and starts in the book on page 272)
link.springer.com/book/10.1007

It's not what I normally work on, but I'm grateful that I was able to find a gap in the literature that I think needs to be filled and to hopefully put some attention toward it!

(Note the paper isn't as polished as I would have liked, the professor who ended up submitting it didn't do as many revisions to what was originally a just supposed to be a term paper as we expected, though I'm sort of a perfectionist 😓 )

@vicgrinberg Who got stabbed? I hope she’s alright 😂

@zleap @zoejardiniere

I agree to an extent; however, it is also possible to create those skills locally by subsidizing training, or through other government programs aside from simply extracting wealth (in the form of trained individuals which their new country has incurred no cost in supporting or training) from impoverished nations (and subsequently putting the workers that are benefiting the new country at low cost through the mill to get citizenship/residency status, which is ridiculous).

Don't get me wrong, I don't think the migrants are wrong for wanting better living/working conditions (I'm considering immigrating to Europe for a tenure track job after I finish my PhD if possible for my wife's sake) but I'm also of the mind that bulk migration isn't necessarily the way to go.

I'm of the mind that hybrid approaches that are win-win for the migrant, the new country, and the old country would be ideal. Constructing such a solution may not be possible in all circumstances, but I think it should be something we strive for (e.g. you can come work here for higher wages and better quality of life, but you need to mentor more doctors that come here on study visas, and we'll compensate your local area for supporting you while you were being trained, etc. etc. etc.).

Long story short, I want to try to do this in the most effective, efficient, and non-zero-sum way possible, and I think our current policies leave a LOT to be desired because there is so little thought that goes into them other than "how many".

@zleap @zoejardiniere I'm sorry but this is a bad take in my opinion (the original toot, that is) and is conflating the ideas of literal human trafficking (e.g. smugglers) with legitimate migration.

Additionally, I would argue that people should have at least some small amount of say in who they want in their neighborhoods, particularly if the migrants are culturally dramatically different than themselves.

While empathy is a good thing in general, too much empathy without regards to real world complications of mixing people from different cultural and religious backgrounds can cause disastrous consequences if not managed appropriately, and by ignoring these problems by saying "it will happen anyway, so why try to stop it" is ridiculous.

That same line of reasoning wasn't apply to covid, nor teen-pregnancy, nor AIDS, or so many societal ills, and yet for migration, something that can literally change the economy, election preferences, voting patterns, culture, etc. of a region/country over the span of 50-100 years, and we are suppose to uncritically accept it and "just let it happen"?

Again, I'm not saying migration is *necessarily* bad, but it's not *necessarily* good either. Suffering, persecution, poverty etc. needs to be alleviated, but migration alone cannot solve this problem; here's a good talk on this from the perspective of poverty: youtube.com/watch?v=KCcFNL7Emw

@BerLinguistin What was it? I see a croissant, but is that jam and coffee? I'm honestly jealous rn, but one day I'll be able to have nice European croissants with my wife...I hope 😩

@BerLinguistin

I wouldn't need grace or strength if my breakfast looked that good, but I'm trying to get healthy right now so...yeah, more wishes for grace and strength please 😂

@Amikke @kilroy_was_here @freemo

RHNB vs FOOF
RHNB vs Titanium Tetraazide
RHNB vs Closed Demon-Core
RHNB vs False Vacuum Decay Event

@DrVeronikaCH @duetosymmetry VosViewer and Citespace may be good options. Also, IIRC, Web of Science does something like this as well, but I may be wrong.

John BS boosted

Anything that makes a city a worse place to drive makes it a better place to live… 👀

xkcd.com/2832/

@vicgrinberg Looks amazing! Have you tried puff pastry wrapped baked brie with (apricot or fig) and pistachio filling? Absolutely delicious as well, and I can send a recipe if you would like!

@bii Bruh I saw the two lines on the picture and almost congratulated you on the pregnancy before realizing what it was 💀

Also, pain != flavor, so it makes sense, but can understand how that would be disconcerting. I've never experienced that symptom with covid before (though I'm miserable every time I get it), but it's the only one my wife gets and she's otherwise fine.

@freemo @bii

Not my point or what I believe (I'm a divine command theorist lmao), but from a secular perspective, I think that's one of the strongest possible arguments for it.

Additionally, it does not mean that society itself is thriving (such a definition of morality would permit rape/pillage for the benefit of MY society over yours, not the cosmopolitan ideal of humanity as a whole), but that each individual has sufficient resources and the ability to control themselves in such a manner that maximizes their ability to self-realize.

Lack of self control is arguably the root of all moral failings; hence, the ability to control oneself in each tempting moment to favor long term chances of self-actualization is the best secular definition of acting morally I can think of.

@freemo @bii

Philosophically, I would argue that unchecked libertarianism, which permits "two consenting adults" to do anything they want (so long as consent was obtained) and allows individuals to act in whatever way they want without imposing moral imperatives unless they harm another person, is not a good system to achieve widespread eudaimonia. Instead, it ultimately results in most individuals being slaves to their desires.

Without a defined set of boundaries on "sin" (i.e. what is morally wrong), societies ultimately end up expanding liberties into those boundaries to the point that ostensible self-harm becomes the norm (see the obesity epidemic for an alternative example; note I'm saying this as a current fat guy).

Gluttony "used to be" a sin for a multitude of reasons, and we are now acutely aware of all the negative impacts on the body and mind that over consumption has, and yet the issue persists (please note that I am not claiming those with real biological issues are necessarily at fault, but most obese individuals are not biologically impaired beyond their control).

The question we must then posit is thus: does consuming explicit sexual material (or producing it) have similar harmful effects on the body and/or mind? The answer to this is yes, both on an individual and societal level. Individually, many men report early-onset erectile dysfunction, inability to achieve orgasm with real partners, and diminished appetite for actual partners but increased appetite for the illicit substitute. Enough of these individuals in a population, may have untold impacts on the culture itself (e.g. japanese herbivore men and their plummeting birthrate).

Thus, if consumption of the product is harmful, then production of it is also harmful (both for society but also the "stars", you can see loads of examples of this in the industry with predatory contracts, grooming of under-age women to take jobs upon turning 18, trafficking, kidnapping, spread of STIs, etc.). There may be a case for "responsible use" or "free-range production" but substances that are targeted as super-normal stimuli are highly addictive and blunt our responses to "realistic" stimuli, thus making the super-normal stimulus more desirable (an effect mentioned above). Of course, there's also the hedonic treadmill effect which causes people to seek ever increasingly stimulating material (that is, their tastes may change over time to desire material that is more explicit than they started on).

Of course, this is all the worst case, but the existence of this case and its prevalence, I think, speaks volumes.

That's my 2 cents, take it for what you think it's worth.

P.S. I have citations for the claims I've made but I'm at work and can't look them up right now. If you want me to link them in a followup toot, lemme know.

@lucifargundam Well I save about 40 minutes of driving per day, which works out to be 200 minutes per week, if we only include my commute to work.

If we factor in the weight loss benefits and my health, it helps there, and it's a great way to guarantee I can go the distance in the event I'm tired, sick or sore.

Finally, while all batteries go out eventually, they can be recycled and have a nearly negligible carbon footprint while in use, and only a moderate one to recycle, which I think is an overall win.

(Also, mine is made by Bosch, which has a lot of safety controls for preventing catastrophic battery issues, as compared to many others which are cheap Chinese products which don't have the same high quality manufacturing standards).

@lucifargundam Edit, nope, 800....that's a bit much q.q but there's no way I can make it up and down these crazy hills without it,

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.