Show newer

>Interestingly, the brewing tensions over Muslim students declining to partake in in-class Pride activities recall the “reasonable accommodation” debates of yesteryear — only with the ideological roles reversed. **The same progressives who once breathlessly defended the right of Muslim women to don Niqabs in voting booths (and, famously, at citizenship ceremonies) are now claiming that celebrating Pride Month is a sine qua non of being Canadian**

And why is this such an issue?
It just shows that those progressives are consistently being .

msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/rahi

PJ boosted

It would be funny if it wasn't tragic how shallow-minded conspiracy the(r)orists really are:

>Forrest Tower, a B.C. Wildfire Service information officer, is no stranger to conspiracy theories.
In 2021, Tower was the subject of a theory that alleged he was a government-hired actor and not a real person, given how well his name suits his job.
"[It was] going around that a fire information officer with my name couldn't possibly be real," he said, adding while it was funny at first, theories can affect emergency operations.

cbc.ca/news/canada/british-col

>Back in 1968, Republicans endorsed youth involvement in politics.

I wonder what happened that the "baby boomer kids" whose protests in '68 helped this "softening" of the conservative establishment are now the most conservative "MAGA" supporting part of the GOP?

couriernewsroom.com/news/the-1

> The commander in charge of reforming the Canadian Armed Forces' culture says military leaders are considering limiting alcohol consumption at holiday events.

Really? Why not ban alcohol consumption for military personnel altogether? After all, you don't want them misbehaving when out of uniform as well.

Not being able to hold your liquor and a tendency to sexual misconduct should be disqualifying factors for entering the military anyway.

cbc.ca/news/canada/canadian-ar

@Pat Well, it becomes a problem when that neighbour walks to my property and start shooting and my only option is to return fire.
And even if I would not go as far as call them murderers, I tend to agree with you that the reason why politicians don't do enough in both cases is because they are serving some "higher" purpose set by their big pharma and gun lobby donors instead of serving the people who elected them.

@Pat I'm not against guns. I'm against the notion that you need a gun in order to protect yourself from wackos with guns.
It is always a lonely person with issues on a rampage. There is no good reason to allow the discharge of firearms in residential areas. Get to a firing range and mingle with other responsible gun owners. What's the problem with that?
And you'll have to explain to me the mass murderers from area code 202.

@Pat

Of course that it can't prevent some wacko from going on a rampage but it may at least minimize the chance of someone accidentally "unwinding" too much in their backyard, especially after a beer or two.

I'm not sure about millions of people shooting guns in their backyards and their neighbors watching over the fence and being happy about it, even in the US.

It is probably different on vast rural properties, but what's the problem with limiting shooting in a densely populated area to well-regulated gun ranges where safety can be assured more reasonably than in your backyard?

It is illegal to build a tree house in your backyard without a permit, but shooting guns is OK? C'mon ...

Firing guns "for fun" outside of properly regulated firing ranges managed by community-sanctioned gun clubs in good standing should be banned and criminalized. Period.

>The search for a Texas man who allegedly shot his neighbors after they asked him to stop firing off rounds in his yard stretched into a second day Sunday, with authorities saying the man could be anywhere by now.
The attack happened near the town of Cleveland, north of Houston, on a street where some residents say neighbors often unwind by firing off guns. 🤔

msn.com/en-ca/news/world/texas

Interesting🤔

>In reality, the region the Big Apple comprises most of is far and away the safest part of the U.S. mainland when it comes to gun violence, while the regions Florida and Texas belong to have per capita firearm death rates (homicides and suicides) three to four times higher than New York’s. On a regional basis it’s the southern swath of the country — in cities and rural areas alike — where the rate of deadly gun violence is most acute, regions where Republicans have dominated state governments for decades.

politico.com/news/magazine/202

@thatguyoverthere
You obviously never heard of sarcasm. That's what I was using (in the context of the discussion) while "standing my ground" after your rather bullyish suggestion I should "move on".
@mike805 @admitsWrongIfProven @freemo @lmrocha

@admitsWrongIfProven

To what purpose would one have to register their religion?
Unlike a gun that can harm others, one's beliefs are a deeply personal thing.

@freemo @thatguyoverthere

Yes, a little bit of an agitated reaction from @admitsWrongIfProven but nothing so overblown or any major excalation as the two of you are presenting it.

And you may agree that a heavily armed person with unresolved issues and no social support or interactions is a very scarry proposition.

@mike805 @lmrocha

@mike805

Well, we all know how things turned out at the end for *that* particular government in Germany. And I'm not sure they had to consult the gun registry much to find the people they didn't like (or that didn't like them).

And, I'm not proposing the confiscation of all legally owned guns like in the UK. Quite the contrary. I want more legally owned, registered and responsibly used guns, but I'm against the return to the Wild West where everyone carries a gun and the one who draws faster gets to stay alive.

If you feel like you need a gun please feel free to (legally) get one, but in these days and age, I should not be ***required*** to carry one to feel safe. I believe some of my tax dollars should go for ensuring that, don't you think?

@admitsWrongIfProven @freemo @thatguyoverthere @lmrocha

@admitsWrongIfProven

It was was "triggered" by @mike805 mention of "extreme cases" needing guns and the example of Switzerland where (if understand that correctly) each canton (state) has its own "well-regulated militia" (or was so in the past?) not sure.

Anyway, responding to nothing in particular. Just a general observation, as having a gun registry seems to be a big issue in the US.

@freemo @thatguyoverthere @lmrocha

@mike805 @admitsWrongIfProven @freemo @thatguyoverthere @lmrocha

The proponents of "guns for all" cite two reasons as far as I can understand:

1️⃣ Protection from violent ***individuals*** with or without guns, and
2️⃣ Protection from a rogue ***government*** that wants to take your guns.

In the first case, the ***regulation*** of gun ownership is not an issue, while in the second it is irrelevant because you are already in the middle of a civil war and, one way or another, you'll find or be given a gun soon.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.