🎓 Doc Freemo 🇳🇱 @freemo@qoto.org

@Acer Its called a Reed-kellogg Sentence Diagram

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentence_diagram

This is the correct amount of nerd.

@icedquinn looks like TeX with a sprinkle of LISP flavor....

@icedquinn

Thanks for the link

@crunklord420 @Hyolobrika@mstdn.io

My 325 ft / 100 m dive plan for tomorrow

#SCUBA #Dive #Diving

@zpartacoos
Welly
You will want to go back to the basics and understand DC and digital electronics first. Learn your ohms law and kirchoffs laws, get the basics down. They will be needed to move on to analog/rd

@icedquinn
Please link to this letter, ill be happy to review.
@crunklord420

@zpartacoos
You will want to start with analog circuit analysis techniques most likely. Do you know dc/digital electronics.

@icedquinn
In the case of data aquired during the research of the paper the raw data is almost always availible on request. I jave never been denied the raw data even once when i inquired.
@crunklord420

@crunklord420

I agree, blocking the data is unexcusable, and very counter to the intention of stopping conspiracy theorists, however absurd those conspiracy theorists happened to be.

@icedquinn

@icedquinn

Sort of, thry are **not** lists of everyone who died or had injury from the vaccine. They are a list of anyone who had any disease, regardless of if it is related to the vaccine, within a month or so of getting the vaccine. So on its own it provides no value as a list of people with adverse effects. Its purpose is only as a starting point tonfind case studies which, upon review, might lead to concerns.

Taking the list and going "look everyone on this list had an adverse reactionto the vaccine" is incorrect and idiotic. The vast majority of people on the list do not have reactions.
@crunklord420

@insurgentem

Yu, which is exactly why its important to note the government agency isnt a scientific journal

@icedquinn @crunklord420

@icedquinn

In scientific papers the source of the data is always cited. But you may need to go off and fet h it from a third party aometimes. You can also usually email the authors and get the raw data

@crunklord420

@crunklord420
Well there are other sources for raw data, but yes i agree obscuring the data is a bad move.

That said there is no dpubt that conspiracy theorists were abusing data they didnt understand. The VARES data in the usa was misrepresented by most of the nutters countless times. Personally im ok with that since freedom of information means idiots will abuse it and thats a fine tradeoff to make. But i do understand the reaction. People were so dumb thry were actually vares was an indication of death counts and other complete nonsense

@icedquinn

@zpartacoos
If you just want to make a radio you could follow existing schematics easy enough. I take it you want a deeper understanding than that however?

@icedquinn

To be fair thats not a scientific journal saying that and PHS doesnt conduct peer review. Thats a government health agency.

@crunklord420

“Humans need fantasy to be human. To be the place where the falling angel meets the rising ape.” -- Terry Pratchett

🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨
⬜🟩🟩⬜⬜
⬜🟩🟩⬜⬜
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

#Wordle 242 5/6

Holy hell I think this was the hardest one yet...

@cwebber@octodon.social

I am happy for you as well. It is just as a tech guy I wonder about the nightmare of indexing and searching and all that jazz. I suppose in the long run it may not matter much once the search engines catch up.

@rhiaro