🎓 Doc Freemo 🇳🇱 @freemo@qoto.org

@johnlogic

What do you mean Trumps? Trump didnt author it. This is done every year by the same institute and presidents can pick and choose what they want to adopt. Last time Trump was elected he adopted some of the recommendations, but far from all. The idea that its "Trump's" idea gives the erroneous impression he is actually smart enough to have a coherent thought, he isnt. It is also factually inaccurate, which makes people like us who hate Trump look sketching when we make claims that arent valid.

@flexghost

Doctor: Did you drink anything today?

Me: Does soy sauce count?

Doctor: .... no

@mekkaokereke As a general rule the more antifascist someone claims to be the more fascist they are in reality. This doesnt surprise me in the least.

@freeschool Love this post, and it is of the length I can digest comortably and potentially meaningfully respond to. Most of your posts are just too long for me to engage with due to my very minimal time investments I have here. Either way, great post, thanks.

@PlumpCat@infosec.exchange I suspect the hard part would be finding a screen whose data lines are compatible. The backlight itself and power needs are the easy part.

@PlumpCat@infosec.exchange I dont know the gameboy internals either. But a modern screen with backlight probably wouldnt take too much power. you could run the backlight right off the battery switch and not stress any electronics if you add an additional regularo there..

Should be doable

@tuxom indeed we have, but that is unrelated to my point... A forest that burns down isnt removed by humans for development, it just burned down. It then grows back and the net neutral carbon is 0.

Now if you showed an event of humans clear cutting and replacing with developed land, that would be a net positive on carbon, presuming it was burnt as fuel. But that isnt what we are seeing here.

@tuxom The difference is trees grow back (assuming you let them) ultimately create a net neutral carbon emission in the end. The same cant be said for fossil fuel consumption.

@PlumpCat@infosec.exchange

Part of me now wants to take a classic gameboy, completely original, and replace **just** the screen with a backlit equivelant... that would be so cool!

@freeschool yea tbey xant be due to.judgement calls or opinion. Thus simply aeeing someone apeeding does not warrent a traffic stop unless someone was meadured objectively in some way

For the sake of gender equality i propose we make all gendered termw nongendered, such as...

Pussycat -> Genitalcat
Cockroach -> genitalroach
Mailman -> humanperson
Cockerapaniel -> Genatilerspaniel
Cockatoo -> Genatilatoo
Pussywillow -> Genital willow
Great tit -> Great chest
Chickadee -> androgadee
Blue footed Booby -> Blue Footed Chesty
Rose-breasted grosbeak -> rose-chested not-gros-just-different-beak

@louis right, when ifs o e or one, or im a guest in their home id bappily respext wbatever values i can ethically respect. But ypu cant expect me and my frienda to all avoid difty jokes just cause uour at the party.

@louis

We are also talking real world friendship not online.

@louis

I could, bit it means she could never hang ojt with my friends and also means i would be .ade ubcomfortable by being aroubd someone who is so sensative to content. I, as a rule, do not choose to.be friends with prudiah people, it makes for a rather ubpleasant interaction.

@louis

Agreed.

Juat had this problem woth an asian lady, new friend. I told a joke that was maybe pg 13 at best. The most offensive part was ghe mere me tion of tbe existance of porn. She was deeply offended. I apologized for violating bsr boubdaries and aaid my jokes are quire a bit more crass than that, best we dont be friends ljt of respect for your boubdaries. She was even more offended j would exclude a friendhip over that.

She cant have it both ways. Im happy to respect her boubdaries, by keeping her away from my friend circle and the jokes contained therein

@louis boubdaries work oth ways too. Aomeone may not want to hear a subject, and i may not want ro be censored. If we are incompatible tbe o ly respectful result is tonwalk away and not be offended

People need to ubderstand you can set any boundaries you want, and people should be expected to respect those boundaries. But people should also know its equally acceptable for someone to want nothing to do with you if they dont like the restrictions those boundaries place.