🎓 Doc Freemo 🇳🇱 @freemo@qoto.org

Website is Live
This website has finally been launched.
Please follow this space for future updates.

Read more here:
https://cleverthis.com/news/website-is-live/

#Administration #CleverThis #ML #MachineLearning #AI #AGI #ArtificialGeneralIntelligence #ArtificialIntelligence #SemanticWeb

@freemo @LouisIngenthron "True by definition".

<insert sad Bertrand Russel and Alfred North Whitehead on their 370 page proof of 1+1=2>

@freemo

do the ones you know want us to have universal health care?

@wjmaggos So as far as billionaires go I only may know one (I'm not sure if he is a billionaire but he is damn close, he was the main investor in a very long list of well known large companies).

And yes, you will often find him in pictures standing next to Obama int he white house back when he was in office. He put a lot of time and money into lobbying for democrat party interest, which included universl health care.

@freemo Not too many free lunches in nature. From this chart, the only way to get off the line common to all materials is structural - making a foam out of it. Not really an analog that can push you in the opposite direction, above the line.

@freemo The style of chart you're looking for is an Ashby chart. With some google-foo, the closest flavor of Ashby chart to what you want I could find publicly available is this:

@customdesigned positronium exists pretty much anytime antimatter-matter collisions take place. They go through a process where they form positronium first, and then after a short halflife will decay into photons. But they dont directly annihilate, just like any other matter they fall into orbitals first until they give off enough energy to reach ground state, their ground state is just annihilation

@freemo In your meme, they are destroying the money by burning it (not spending it). They are literally and irreversibly reducing the money supply, and hence inflation.

@LouisIngenthron

> These universal truths I describe are often incredibly narrowly defined, by necessity. I believe very few things are truly absolute, but there are a few.

The fact that you have to define them at all, let alone narrowly, make them non-absolute truths. They are only true under a definition, and thus circular... at best you are creating circular arguments with extra steps to obscure the circular nature of the argument. But its absolutely no different than 1+1=2 being true by definition, you are just using looser linguistic definitions rather thant he mathematical ones.

@LouisIngenthron

> For water, your quantity is not "1", but rather "blob". So, yes, blob+blob=blob, but none of those are integers. When they combine, it's not the math that changes, but rather the means by which you measure it. In different units, such as one gallon plus one gallon, the math holds true.

Blob is not a quantity, its a thing... You are acting like the question "How many blobs do I have" cant be "1".

The problem is "quantity" depends on "the quantity of what exactly".

blobs are measured in integers and yes 1 is a valid quantity of blobs. Blobs (like ducks) can also be measures in volume, in which case 1 m^3 + 1 m^3 = 2 m^3. But i wasnt measuring by volume, just as i didnt measurte by volume of ducks, i was measuring by unit, as we do with ducks.

If i make a duck into ground meat, and make it into sausage I can say "I have 1m^3 of duck meat" or I can say ""I have a pile of meat here that is 2 ducks of meat". Both are just as valid as the other.