Freedom=Growing Each Other @freeschool@qoto.org

I probably added enough of naming-the-bad-comments just to say today was a really good day (as usual for me though I do say the bad for clarity mostly) - Today I cut my own hair, quick-showered a la Wim Hof (on grass with 2 x 5L bottle), 2 sausage barbecue and did some more editing :)

Nice day.

The local timeline was looking a bit shaky just before with a few sentences like a list of emotional dilemma and mini-crisis type sentences... which I kinda like as honesty as it's obvious all have it so it's potential healing too. I offer my psychological companionship and maybe future help (even though mostly just being present with someone is what mostly a person needs more even saying anything).

My friend messages me and I do Jitsi chat like in 5mins without saying much after a small hi and then starts work on that difficult thing!

Music culture is the key in many ways and I think it can help the many people to feel good with ourselves and others and be part of something that thrives on itself.

#Music Culture.

Our own thoughts about it included.

Giving up privileges / reducing luxiers and levelling the playing field is one of the new challenges we face in life... while not letting it all go to shit either or going to complete 0. But really toning down the volume and speed a bit.

Perhaps a kind of undoing somewhat from the unfair system of gaining / having privilege itself which has gone too far I hope you agree. Our *given/allowed* privilege under strict rules / supervision / hierarchy is what the system leverages / keep us in comfort and is using as leverage to crack other things, to push / put pressure on others backed by comfortable / in-luxury people... without wanting to reduce the gap or the big step from all or nothing, contrasts or hierarchy as the main privilege and %'s paying each in the ladder or pyramid.

Systems are not aiming to level the playing field (like not upgrading your tech all the time) or go for universal human rights (geiving all the basics / being comfortable to a lower level which can be spread to more people rather than funnelled and redirected to fat cat pockets).

The birth of technology mostly for war. The mentality of war from the start of who is financing and perpetuating technology for the expansion of empires, it's research and development etc.
Unfortunate.

[short advertisement: This text is supported by the Military... buy one bomb and get another free... or join the members club for extra discount from other member countries supplies and resources... get a 50% bonus for waging war x2 per year on non-member states]

Puts into question all tech and how anything that exists (and is regulated) is also in question if undoubtedly only because what exists is or was wanted by the older guard and then what wasn't wanted was QUASHED / SQUASHED declared an enemy OR simply regulated to achieve the same overall outcome financially (including keeping people distracting / buying / upgrading / economic warfare / being spied upon / basically everything as long as it doesn't endanger the machine or MACHINE MINDSET domination.)

While no doubt benefits and advancement... (on top of the shit) the main aim has been advancing more the other stuff otherwise it simply wouldn't exist.
( hint: I don't think it was for freedom all this existed and still isn't! They are winning BIG so allow things to continue somewhat *conditionally* if it hits big in terms of financing war or getting money, tax to fuel the empire... Just another re-use called tech!)

Love to hear how it's not regulated and not run but gov.
thanks

P.S Token gestures of 'good-within-bad half-accepted much like monsters might give birth to lesser monsters or tech synthetics we could never build without the command and conquer metals from Cambodia or wherever. All those things conquered allow our privilege to Tech, unless you can actually make a PCB / everything from scratch... (so while I'm tolerant and not over-pricing #climate change since we do need to effect it, it's most at the hand of THE HANDS BEFORE us that possibly prevents obvious connection and link / birth to Tech itself and arguably it's perpetuation / continual destruction / control-domination in it's creation).

#Quotes during #audio edits...
Caring is the context here for #XMPP and other #Tech...

"We need to come up with creative ways so people relate to the problem. And different people relate in different ways...

Examples:

Some people care about free sharing of knowledge...

Other people relate it to Dictatorship vs. Democracy...

Other people relate to it by being able to fix and repair their own car, heater, fan, object etc...

Other people relate it to by the Centralised and DeCentralised aspect....

Many types...

I was writing about some mystery I've cleared up (in short all humans are much like shitposters) and I added the "dun-dun-derrr" in my text to represent the chords of the instrument played just before mystery or after it... (just imagine it now dun-dun-derrr like in a Agatha Christie / Hercule Poirot mystery moment when attacker is revealed or there is a pause in the scene)

And then I looked up Agatha Christie.. .and well that is one hell of a journey itself !
So if you don't ever read a book of hers ever, just read her wiki page! That's enough for a while!

[ dun-dun-derrr ]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agatha_Christie

Those who can't read more than a few paragraphs are quite unintelligent or more intelligent in some way but universally lacking probably in many things as a result...

so more about this, also a mini-rant of what we're dealing with as a ' society '

So if depth across the internet and even in person in their daily life suffers and doesn't exist, if they can't stand 'communication itself' - i.e. can't tolerate talking about it then what do we do!?
I believe meeting different styles / re-balancing is always the case. How about you?

Restricting it to short only implies their ability somewhat and stance (without looking down on them) because the case more often is that it's related that you can't do short all the time with damage to understanding and suffering the cost to others or yourself.

Considering life is always more complicated than they might think, people who choose to ignore depth, repulse it, or not answer and even complain in depth about things mostly they want to avoid it (this is part of the Yes/No/Maybe).

Of course few other things involved but mostly this is your opinion without writing-off humanity also (but you do feel without this it's almost totally a big part to blame and most people can do longer conversation, just don't want to or *choose* when they want selfishly like when they complain about stuff they should have been doing something about!!)

(Less intelligent) = IF can't do long or can't ' decrypt ' others

People who expect the yahoo.com news headlines (or even Guardian) tabloid style big font short newspaper headline 'did you know' informational things that also avoid self-action / self-determination and avoid many points...

People who do good work don't always want to be paid, they just want to live and see people happy.

( To work and be more free (or do it low at cost), toward freedom somewhat ( or just plain don't want to use money or feel not need or confidence for it until forced! )

That equation we need to find an answer for because it is not fair on the good people of #freesoftware or #freedom etc (of anything) inside this current construct just to need to use money because other people sad so. Often money is proportionally NOT NEEDED and is bloat or greed, or overkill, and just the good will without being taxed is all the world needs.
And there is obviously enough of goodwill amongst people and the same way it works towards greed it could just work incrementally towards freedom / with less money for sure.

But how to achieve this if it's true it's possible? I think it is possible and people do want for it, only we're locked into trusting anonyms, banks, promises (proven lies), being taxed etc...

Quotes during edits... XMPP is the context today:

" Compartmentalisation in education, that is the problem...

...They don't tell you why no action is happening. The political part is missing. "

Noun: compartmentalisation
(in this context = A mild state of dissociation / things into classes of the same type)

Collaboration becomes more necessary when you see how you need me as I you,
then instantly we have an eco-system much like the formidable one we have now, but in the human and plant orientated way of sympathy empathy self-justice together AND more well-thought machines mixed in considering people.

Now we have almost only repetitive mechanical work and machines,,, so this is my proposal to you:

1 Imagine I'm amazing in my own way.

2 Imagine you would want the same for you = mostly for people to understand and tend to your needs (even if they did very little or just considered you in their equations)

3 The best time to start knowing one is not in 10years, it's now... and while you still can (there is a lot of threat and threat detection happening so we are literally our own best bet).

The best time to plant a tree, if indeed you believe in trees, is now.
And by that same phrase I'd say that tree is a person... and that is how we win this together...
trees.... people

I'm happy with what comes up on the search for Justice

http://freeschool.0id.org/?s=justice

Without even clicking anything....
A quick scan of titles = the formulae and answer to why and parts to what is needed is all there!

You can also refine the search.

Source of hate comes from these mainly;

someone's insecurity
someone's low self-confidence
someone's competitiveness
someone's perfectionism
someone's jealousy / feel of possession
someone's envy / feeling without
someone's love / overwhelming passion they don't know how to express to person or topic
someone's lack of self-esteem

someone's belief if they suffer or have conditions to living then all should suffer / have conditions to living

someone's belief all people should be treated equally despite being different / very unique

(last one above might a type of discrimination with 'go-to-do intentions that rise above actual logic that the uniqueness we all have is undoubtedly not equal or the same or needs the same / wants for the same etc... and can even be oppressive!)

I'd like comment on that last one especially as I'm quite sure... but would like to hear potential flaws
(if we are going to have a next wave of governing (ideally not government but being together as sovereign entities (sound paradoxical perhaps but just catering for each individuals own pre-sets as well as trying new, if all can be honest enough)

And feel free to add to the list or even if you encountered it today... write!

Video of Rob Braxman.

Designer of Brax2 De-Googled phones.

I made an edit also before this one + notes. Full video here
(Attached is last 5mins + Notes)

https://yewtu.be/watch?v=CS5o2AFpEJ0

**********
Summary:
**********
De-googled / Linux phone (not having Android ---> Google's OS)

2FA - Two-Factor Authentication
Google app requires 2FA for everything slowly (YouTube etc)

De-Googled phones don't reveal IMEI to OS as default - V.important

Multiple devices + associations

"People tend to think that other dictatorships are bad but their own dictatorship would be good."

Quotes (during edits)...
XMPP is the context and making a new project with voting powers.

"...The problem is the social side NOT the technical side..."

Quotes (during edits)...
XMPP is the context: About how we can do things with what little we have vs. BigTech, and why one way is getting the masses onto things like XMPP to then help everything else a bit more, and be more aware to do less damage leaking data everywhere about themselves / everyone else and preserve their rights which they give up to others in the proprietary world.

Many people (skilled or unskilled) think life is someone else's problem... and even that ALL of it is not their problem... Actually it is but being able to prioritise both High and Low priority means you can /attempt/ to fix many things... It's a lot to ask but it is possible because it's all connected...
and how much you want to connect life back (the talking about things, asking consent between people, more meetings etc, forming local groups and activities) this is up to you how far you take it.

If you do only 1 thing and pay bills that is not you whole responsibility in life... THAT IS WRONG! It's not helping from system to be in this template BUT it's still not everything or excuse.

Without the freedoms and topics in life, at least in overview, not much of your work is great unless it connects back to everything else. AND I MEAN EVERYTHING BECAUSE THAT IS 'LIFE' AS A A DEFINITION ITSELF!
(LIVING COLLECTIVELY)

In a nice way there is no choice but to relate to everyone! So the goal is to link it nicely or have everyone and every thing in mind eventually!