Show newer

I just hope that after a century people have smartened up and the instantaneous and global news cycle on social media can make a difference in how we react to the completely natural of change:
getpocket.com/explore/item/geo

Terrific article about how the “Move fast and break things” philosophy inevitably leads to the rise of group -based societies.
In fact, all need a "cleanup" time to establish the "new order" and restore all the good things they have broken in the process.
noemamag.com/the-perils-of-sma

@Romaq @freemo

The majority is not like that. We all have our own quirks, but at the end I think most of us will enjoy in a nice "heated" exchange around the same table with a glass of something in their hand.
It is just that a limited number of the same individuals that don't like to be questioned, most often than not, have also the urge to tell others what (how) they should think.
In my experience, they are all sooner or later "cancelled" just as a matter natural progression of things around the table because they are boring.

@Romaq @freemo

I think it might be just the people who don't like to be questioned😀

From "The Socratic Way Of Questioning":

"A must be both and . It must express “the perfect idea" of a thing, but if we cannot have perfect clarity, we should at least have "perfect distinctness.” so that it is not mistaken for some other thing".

In other words, if you are not able to properly describe what a thing IS, try to explain what the thing ISN'T.

Very glad I found this community. Please don't stop Question Others to Teach Ourselves😀

goodreads.com/book/show/597120

@antlerboy

Erotic framework? Looks o me like a desperate attempt to produce some traction for . What's next, ?😀

Heisenberg's Levels of :
1. Things objectified independently of the knowledge process ( of );
2. Things inseparable from the knowledge process (, );
3. Things created in the knowledge process (, art, politics, religion).

The properties of adaptive are the product of the "bottom-up" interaction of components that maintain the system's existence and which are only constrained () by the emergent internal (structural) of the system as a whole, and the limitations of its niche.
There is no such thing as "".

"Reality is not merely a social construction, the consensus of a collectivity, or some inter-subjective agreement. It also has a trans-subjective dimension: for example, experimental data can ruin the most beautiful scientific theory."
B_Nicolescu
Transdisciplinarity[ researchgate.net/publication/2]: the hidden third, between the subject and the object

Show thread

"Because our brains are future-predicting machines, it’s natural to want to avoid ambiguity. “As human beings, we crave security, and that is why all of us are intolerant of uncertainty to some extent,” writes Fox.
greatergood.berkeley.edu/artic

"For years, many linguists have believed that learning language is impossible without a built-in grammar template. The new AI models prove otherwise. They demonstrate that the ability to produce grammatical language can be learned from linguistic experience alone. Likewise, we suggest that children do not need an innate grammar to learn language."
theconversation.com/ai-is-chan

The idea that we don't see the true reality, has to do with (knowing), rather than (being). The fact that two people have different perceptions of their common reality does not refute that theirs *is* still one and the same reality.
spin.atomicobject.com/2020/05/

It would be interesting to see what happens when it hits a water pipe, gas line, or electrical cable:
twitter.com/specializetool/sta

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.