My is not hotloading, although its codebase is just a copy of another that worked beatifully, and that a copy of another that never had troubles, either. I've looked over every difference I can find and see nothing. The WATCHER is working fine; when I make a code change, I see a spinner. But updates don't actually appear. React Devtools also show that nothing is connected. But manual hitting "refresh" works, though it feels like I'm back in the stone ages...

I always mentally wonder about vs , knowing that 's decision to avoid is very deliberate. But TypeScript is conquering the world; is that an ad populum sign that Types are really a better way to go? Or does ClojureScript offer other things instead? If so, what are they, and to do the benefits of each option find value in different situations?

swizec.com/blog/the-efficacy-o

The language and languages are so stable, with breaking changes being frowned upon in the culture. But breaking in the (frankly, awesome!) tooling has been my difficulty as I maintain a dozen projects of varying ages. It is a real problem.

Wait... do you seriously mean to tell me that I've spent hours debugging the fact that `` is NOT recursive? So ` {"authorizationParams" {"redirect_uri" (-> js/window .-location .-origin)}}` is NOT {"authorizationParams"v {"redirect_uri" (-> js/window .-location .-origin)}}`? I probably read this somewhere, but UGH!

And yes, I know that even fixed this equality wouldn't work because JS always breaks equality... but the point is clear.

I made a site using . The last step was to remove the . But I still use Shadow to start up a local server and explore my static site in-browser. It works nicely as a quick server.

The data coming through the pipeline on one view was missing a crucial piece. It was sweet to be able to add it to the back-end function that is gathering the data, evaluate the form, and boom! It was there for my front-end view as soon as I used my usual endpoint.

One of my projects for the past year has been converting an old PDF multimedia app into a static web site. Since is better than raw HTML or CSS, I crafted it there before grabbing the output static stuff. It is 99% JS-free, except for optional media lightboxes, and is built to last as long as HTML does, and to run as simply as possible.

RT @borkdude
I have a lot of respect for what has become over the years. Thanks @dnolen, @mfikes and many others.

RT @janetacarr
Does anyone have any questions about or ? (Could also be general development stuff too)

Let me know if I can help ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿป

RT @pjstadig
Today is my first day at sovasage.com/ and I'm looking for some good and developers! I'd love to hear from you. :)

Hmm. I have a lot of respect for theller's work, but isn't shadowcss github.com/thheller/shadow-css just reinventing the wheel? I love using gardencss for gen, and it works great cljc. github.com/noprompt/garden

Benefits to using your full programming language for your : I wrote code that determines whether my domain is subdomain or subpath and rewrites my resource paths accordingly, shared with both resource calls (like <img>) and css url functions (like `background: url(SOMEPATH)`).

RT @JacekSchae
If you ever wanted to build "native" apps without or any other here is a thing you might want to take a look at -- github.com/thheller/shadow-gro -- build by @thheller (creator of shadow-cljs)

Great answers here
---
RT @fndriven
I still don't understand how to properly use JS promises in . ๐Ÿคท
twitter.com/fndriven/status/15

Honestly this is a big one of the reasons I choose /#Clojure: maximum capability while maintaining a culture of low-turbulence, high stability, low junk
---
RT @iamaponte
Any Frontend developer who's been in tech for the last decade is like...
twitter.com/iamaponte/status/1

Show more
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.