Show newer

Found this interesting chapter from a (quite expensive) book. Not sure why the authors differentiate between and concepts, but nonetheless a very interesting discussion.
researchgate.net/publication/3
The "Virtuous Continuum of Responses" in Fig. 2 has two apparent aspects:
1️⃣ Commitment to following the or to
2️⃣ Commitment to or to a
I find it intriguing that by looking at it this way it seems like a religious individual may become but never . A truly individual has to be prepared to oppose the of the land (both secular and religious) if it endangers "long-term value creation and the duties owed to all stakeholders".

From to in Addressing

"This article contrasts with and approaches to harm, which are usually context-sensitive, relational, and individualized. We argue that subsidiarity—the principle that should have meaningful within larger systems—might foster the balance between context and scale that is needed for improving responses to harm."

journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.11

Show thread

@jimdonegan

Sure. And if you follow the chain of , "Man created God" so there you are.😀

Recently read this articl about "why we should embrace ":

spin.atomicobject.com/2020/05/
I understand but don't know where to put the .

Just because we are not able to perceive the "true" , that does not mean such a thing does not exist and that we all live in our own little .

I think a much better term would be for the fact that our capabilities do not extend beyond controlling our own internal .

As an illustration of the pervasive lack of control humility in our society, in a recent discussion, I've got this comment: "This controller's "internal" states just controlled you, or you would not have responded."😀

Probabilmente il miglior "concept album" di tutti i tempi:

youtu.be/Qug8SvnTKOo

@ilovecomputers

I think some of his early work might be better.
The choreography in particular😀

youtu.be/-GXQTEtAc1w

of :

1️⃣Summa Technologiae - Stanisław Lem
2️⃣The Selfish Gene - Richard Dawkins
3️⃣An Introduction to Cybernetics - W. Ross Ashby
4️⃣Thinking in Systems - Donella H. Meadows
5️⃣The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement - Eliyahu M. Goldratt
6️⃣At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity - Stuart Kauffman
7️⃣A Question of Physics: Conversations in Physics and Biology conducted by Paul Buckley and David F. Peat

Show thread

of :

1️⃣ Summa Technologiae - Stanisław Lem
2️⃣The Glass Bead Game - Hermann Hesse
3️⃣The Foundation series - Isaac Asimov
4️⃣The Teachings of Don Juan - Carlos Castañeda
5️⃣Earth's Children series - Jean M. Auel
6️⃣Jonathan Livingston Seagull - Richard Bach
7️⃣Siddhartha - Hermann Hesse

@freemo

I think this passage says it all:

"The reason QOTO became a focal point at this time is because *we were one of the only servers that allowed our users to choose what content they wanted to block*, and made our blocklist optional, but at the same time *had a zero tolerance stance for hate speech and prejudice*. It became a haven for the LGBTQ+ community that wanted the freedom to choose for themselves what instances make the cut or not."

Do you want to be treated as an *adult* - free to explore the world but held responsible for what you do and say, or as an *infant* that needs protection because they don't know yet how to navigate this world and cannot be held responsible for what they do and say?

I was updating my Bio and realized I've never had a proper . So here it is:

Retired professional and coach with years of experience in the and domains.

WRT to , I'm primarily interested in the and of . My attitude towards is opportunistic (will use whatever works best for the occasion) and I consider a necessary evil to get things done properly.

My experience with technology starts in the late 70's on a room-sized IBM machine and programs on punch-cards, transitioned to the HPL on an HP 9825A "fully algebraic desktop calculator" and ended abruptly with the "peeking" and "poking" on a ZX81.

Even if I was reasonably good at it, after getting my first DOS/Windows PC to play with on something called the , I fell in love with things like , , and new ideas, that could be done much better and faster with this new gadget, and soon decided that being a , doing the and while dealing with other to define and is much more fun than the actual of the product itself.

I'm very glad I found this where we can "Question Others to Teach Ourselves". Please feel free to ask questions and argue with my views. Be sure I'll be doing the same. Nothing is sacred. There are no stupid questions, just BS answers.

Stay safe and be nice to other people.

@pj

PJ boosted

I ran across the FLICC model of science denial a while ago while reading _How to Talk to a Science Denier_ by Lee McIntyre. I can say that throughout the years of engaging flat-earthers, stop-the-stealers, creationists, Covid deniers, vaccine skeptics, QAnon believers, and the like, I have faced every one of the techniques outlined. ([Image Source](skepticalscience.com/history-F))

, , ,

Radio Paradise, from Eureka CA, a pioneer in the "" is hiring a CTO:

"We'll pay you enough to live here comfortably. Semi-generous by local standards, low compared to SF, LA, NYC or London. “Enough” is all any of us aspire to make here. We're not capitalists. We participate – gratefully – in a gift economy. That's a huge part of why we love coming to work each day."

Check it out, forward to anyone who might be interested, or just listen the superb lineups of music on multiple different streams. It's free.😘

radioparadise.com/blog/cto

@lime @freemo Well you managed to rope me in. 😣

I don't have any problem with pronouns. They are part of an individual's and groups have, as systems to protect and achieve other personal goals, an important role in society.

I would not be pleased, however, if my group identity, or I am, was used by someone to define I am.

It is rather the I am that defines I'm going about the I am.

@freemo are a problem only if you speak about someone to a third person as, for example, in "they did that to them". If you speak about yourself (I) or to someone directly (you) then there is no such a problem.

So stop bitching about people behind their backs and you won't get in trouble for using the wrong pronoun. 😉

Viktor Frankl on the Human Search for Meaning
“Everything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms — to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way.”
themarginalian.org/2013/03/26/

@DrYohanJohn

The real problem is that we often cede (temporary) control to individuals that are neither singular nor remarkable. Just loud bullies.

And, BTW, Tesla gave us AC current and transformers that made long distance electrical distribution possible, was not in control of anything, even his own life, and the only thing he disrupted was Edison's flawed business plan based on DC current.

@aronza

I see as a enterprise, therefore associated to the one plays in the system(s) they belong (or want to belong).

The issue I'm trying to point at, is that, according to (social) , your personal identity is defined by the group you belong (ethnicity, religion, nationality ...) which is wrong.

Good thing does not always correlate with .

Jess Wade  
“The disproportionate scientific productivity of elite researchers can be largely explained by their substantial labor advantage rather than inhere...
Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.