Show newer

does not promote .

"Táíwò’s project is reclamation. “It’s a starting point,” he said of the concept’s original use. “It’s compatible with working on common problems with people from other identity groups.”"

nymag.com/intelligencer/articl

Show thread

I've always considered , much like , an 's own, personal, tacit, unique attribute, evolved through a lifetime and representing the history of all social interactions they had with their environment.

I find the modern focus on the many "identities" (father, golfer, employee, etc ...) one has during the day, wrong.

In my view, these are just external one assumes and plays in different they are part of. They may define an individual is but not they are.

In fact, I believe that it is an individual is that affect they do they do in the role they are given.

I also consider the largely accepted academic presented in the attached document as the direct cause of our present dysfunctional society marred by .

researchgate.net/publication/3

PJ boosted

I just realized something very powerful.....

I am sitting here, in my office, at a company I own a large chunk of, running the entire company, all because I made the discovery of a lifetime that will change the entire face of medicine int he next few years, save millions if not billions of lives, and about to go public on the stock exchange... everything suggests I havent just made the scientific discovery of a lifetime, saved the world (hopefully), but will probably be a billionaire in the next few years at this rate....

Yet here I am letting a few vile twerps on a small social media network get under my skin and hurt me... fuck them, they could only hope to do a fraction of the good I'm doing. All they want to do is lie, hurt, and tare down good people to make their own pathetic egos feel like it has some value...

I think im good, they only mattered because I let them.

@skanman

Thanks. I had similar sobering thoughts as well while reading this article.
There is also a book by E. Fromm on the same topic he wrote in the distant 1941:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escape_f

I vividly recall my first HP Pocket Calculator with Reverse Polish Notation I had during my undergraduate studies:

hpmuseum.org/hp35.htm

is normally seen as a privilege and not a reason to be afraid. But many people did fear freedom, Ms. Müller commented on the developments in Eastern Europe. The initial euphoria of finally being set free had soon worn off and evaporated, replaced in many places by fear. , she said, “is as complicated as freedom.” Adding momentum, organized fear is at the heart of all authoritarian regimes, which try to literally raise people to be afraid.”

bosch-stiftung.de/en/news/how-

I just hope that after a century people have smartened up and the instantaneous and global news cycle on social media can make a difference in how we react to the completely natural of change:
getpocket.com/explore/item/geo

Terrific article about how the “Move fast and break things” philosophy inevitably leads to the rise of group -based societies.
In fact, all need a "cleanup" time to establish the "new order" and restore all the good things they have broken in the process.
noemamag.com/the-perils-of-sma

@Romaq @freemo

The majority is not like that. We all have our own quirks, but at the end I think most of us will enjoy in a nice "heated" exchange around the same table with a glass of something in their hand.
It is just that a limited number of the same individuals that don't like to be questioned, most often than not, have also the urge to tell others what (how) they should think.
In my experience, they are all sooner or later "cancelled" just as a matter natural progression of things around the table because they are boring.

@Romaq @freemo

I think it might be just the people who don't like to be questioned😀

From "The Socratic Way Of Questioning":

"A must be both and . It must express “the perfect idea" of a thing, but if we cannot have perfect clarity, we should at least have "perfect distinctness.” so that it is not mistaken for some other thing".

In other words, if you are not able to properly describe what a thing IS, try to explain what the thing ISN'T.

Very glad I found this community. Please don't stop Question Others to Teach Ourselves😀

goodreads.com/book/show/597120

@antlerboy

Erotic framework? Looks o me like a desperate attempt to produce some traction for . What's next, ?😀

Heisenberg's Levels of :
1. Things objectified independently of the knowledge process ( of );
2. Things inseparable from the knowledge process (, );
3. Things created in the knowledge process (, art, politics, religion).

The properties of adaptive are the product of the "bottom-up" interaction of components that maintain the system's existence and which are only constrained () by the emergent internal (structural) of the system as a whole, and the limitations of its niche.
There is no such thing as "".

"Reality is not merely a social construction, the consensus of a collectivity, or some inter-subjective agreement. It also has a trans-subjective dimension: for example, experimental data can ruin the most beautiful scientific theory."
B_Nicolescu
Transdisciplinarity[ researchgate.net/publication/2]: the hidden third, between the subject and the object

Show thread

"Because our brains are future-predicting machines, it’s natural to want to avoid ambiguity. “As human beings, we crave security, and that is why all of us are intolerant of uncertainty to some extent,” writes Fox.
greatergood.berkeley.edu/artic

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.