Show more

@unklar
But seriously. It is a proven fact that just enough is better for :

Recent surveys show that managers tend to consider compliance restrictions and a lack of resources as the main obstacles to innovation. This common wisdom suggests eradicating all constraints: by getting rid of rules and boundaries, creativity, and innovative thinking will thrive. Our research, however, challenges this wisdom and suggests that managers can innovate better by embracing constraints.

hbr.org/2019/11/why-constraint

This was already tried numerous times throughout history. It is beyond me why would someone think civilization states may work in this day and age. “Civilised” or not, a state is as good or bad as the relationships it maintains with its own people and its neighbors.

is what every tribe and community developed to affirm its sense of . Some cultures established with clear that further nurtured their cultures (and) were led by “men of prowess”: chiefs or priests, princes or kings, even emperors.
began with the idea that the “civilized” had to confront the “barbaric.” Men of vision set out to find meaning in life beyond their own borders. They ranged from prophets and teachers who inspired those with wealth and power to spread their message to everyone.

noemamag.com/modernizing-ancie

@omartwotone

OK. A couple of remarks (from the bottom up):

1️⃣There are only two domains: the (external) domain, which also contains the "virtual" electronic representation, and the (internal) domain of interaction between and .

2️⃣There are no external "sources" of information, knowledge, or understanding. These are all within the "cognitive domain" of the individual learning system (or organization) from external data.

3️⃣Situational awareness, intelligence, insight, foresight, and understanding are all different terms describing a current knowledge of the dynamical (learning) system.

The bottom line is that you can only use your existing knowledge to extract information from external data. You afterward combine this new information with your existing knowledge (learn) which may change your internal knowledge state and understanding of the state of affairs in the physical domain.

Simple😀

@omartwotone

Nice. Thanks. A military doctrine document? No wonder it is so convoluted😀.
I'll let you know what I think is wrong with it after I give a closer look. Thanks again.

@omartwotone

Found where? Seems like it was taken from a book or a paper.

I find it pretty confusing just by itself. Three information domains, external information providing intelligence sources while having nothing to do with internal knowledge which is listed under other sources?

I wonder if Figure 2.1. may provide some better understanding?

@omartwotone

Is there some explanatory text going with this picture?

Why would you want to “toughen up” a highly sensitive [precise instrument?

1️⃣ are naturally more empathic and caring to the needs of other people
2️⃣ HSPs are trusted by their peers because of their honesty and conscientiousness
3️⃣ HSPs notice little details that others might miss
4️⃣ HSPs are very creative and can appreciate things at a deeper level
5️⃣ HSPs have more insight into their mental and emotional processes
6️⃣ HSPs feel more connected to the world around them
7️⃣ HSPs feel positive emotions more deeply

getpocket.com/explore/item/hig

attempts to give to non-scientific ways of the status that is given to , but it omits the of science to new that is essential to that status.

M.C. Bateson - in Legacy for Living Systems, pg 22

link.springer.com/book/10.1007

For millions of viewers, “it’s just a Pavlovian response to put on Fox News at eight o’clock,” Lawrence said. “Tucker needs the eight-o’clock hour on Fox News way more than Fox News needs Tucker.”

newyorker.com/news/annals-of-c

The scale of importance runs probably in this order:

1️⃣
2️⃣
3️⃣

A healthy and educated population is better equipped for defending a society that assures those basic needs are satisfied.

As long as there is no room for economic or political in such a society.

Show thread

I was wondering where and Maçães got the idea about the “decline of Western liberalism”:

ft.com/video/a49cfa25-610e-438

Show thread

The illiberal promise is that once we’ve dispensed with liberalism’s inconvenience, uncertainty, and constant rumbles of public dispute, you will end up empowered. Your morals will be enshrined in law. Your culture will be propagated by the government. Your friends will be rewarded and your enemies punished.
But a litany of wars, inquisitions, and purges show that for almost everyone, this promise is a lie. Without liberalism, you probably won’t end up empowered. You’ll end up bearably oppressed, if you’re lucky, or persecuted or dead if you’re not.

thedailybeast.com/anti-liberal

Show thread

I would not dismiss Western so fast as Bruno Maçães, Portugal’s former secretary of state for European affairs does in this propaganda article from .

Western Liberalism was on its “deathbed” many times but somehow always managed to defeat any lined up as its replacement, with either nationalist () or inter-nationalist () roots.

noemamag.com/the-return-of-civ

The Future of according to is in the Chinese model of a "Civilization State" with no Italian food.🤔

noemamag.com/article-topic/fut

PJ boosted

People often interpret Ashby’s Law (after W. Ross Ashby) as if the system’s internal states must have the same level of variety as its environment in order to survive, which implies that the system should be able to respond (react) to every little disturbance from the environment.

This is not completely true because, on the lowest, , level, the system blocks from an (environmental) reaching the (internal, system protected) in two ways:

1️⃣ isolation (sheltering) from most environmental disturbances, and

2️⃣ reaction to (parring with) the remaining disturbance that managed to break through this passive protection.

from “Intro to
pespmc1.vub.ac.be/ASHBBOOK.htm

If you want to know what someone’s really is, watch them when they are in a position of :

Bonhoeffer’s argument is that the more someone becomes part of the establishment, the less an individual they become. A charismatic, exciting outsider, bursting with intelligence and sensible policies, becomes imbecilic the moment he takes office. It’s as if, “slogans, catchwords and the like… have taken possession of him. He is under a spell, blinded, misused, and abused in his very being.”

bigthink.com/thinking/bonhoeff

Show more
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.