Show newer

“To condemn the —which I believe to be a moral and political imperative—is not at all the same thing as opposing the . Many observers have been reluctant to do the former because they wish to avoid the latter. I maintain that this is a grave mistake. […] intellectuals who make excuses for , even in the face of the awful killing of , are making a monumental moral and political error.”


quillette.com/2020/06/03/conde

There are universal sites that don't include at all. There are accessible, progressively-enhanced sites that use sensibly. There are crappy web apps that rely too much on .

…and then there is , which is a blank page unless you keep its tab focused while linkedin.com/feed/ is loading and stare at it attentively and in reverential silence.

I think @bert would be even more appalled than me about this 😉

@pganssle, same story here (mastodon.technology → qoto.org).
For me, the alarm went off in December last year, when I shared a quote (verbatim, without commentary) from a Scientific American article, and ashfurrow@mastodon.technology replied privately:
“Spreading sexist misinformation violates our code of conduct. This is your only warning that this isn’t acceptable on this instance.”
After that, when I tried to migrate my followers, I discovered about his blocking qoto.org.

@design_RG, are discussions still at an impasse?
Just curious. To be honest, at this point I think it'd be best if mastodon.technology simply suffered the consequences of its own bad policies — I want to see the smart users migrating away from it.

I am three days away from a 2-year-long streak on : learning a tiny bit of 🇯🇵 and/or 🇩🇪 each and every day since June 2018 — and I've been travelling, out of the country, off sick…
Maintaining the streak is a silly thing, but this kind of challenges help me keep motivated and going.
I finished the German course long ago, so now I am just “practising” and not learning new stuff; and I've reached a point in Japanese where I'm not learning well (I should be properly studying grammar, vocabulary and kanji instead). On the other hand, losing the streak would be a pity, and I'm not confident that I would study regularly if I switched to my textbooks…
Mastodon: what should I do?

mastodon.technology/@tripu/102
duolingo.com/profile/tripu.inf

tripu boosted

A slide built in the 60's in romania. Still up though apparently boarded up. Shame I would definitely play on this as an adult!

Concrete Toboggan slide - Playground Floreasca.

Bucharest, Romania.

Built in 1959-1960

Architect Victor Agent et al.

@btcprox@mstdn.io
Ah, yes… Indeed. Many of us have found ourselves in that quandary already. The , I call it.
/cc @Gargron

tripu boosted

This should be interesting... Mastodon servers that aren’t hosted from/in the US should prepare to handle more traffic, I think...

Show thread

on how to learn what's necessary to think from first principles:

1. (eg “The Selfish Gene”, “The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human Evolution”).
2. (“markets are the continuation of natural and sexual selection by other means”).
3. Offbeat (regular history, Howard Zinn's version, conservative versions, etc).
4. (the most durable parts).

Then: , , ,

jamesaltucher.com/podcast/472-

:
[…] can create forcefields, but he can only trigger them if he's protecting somebody else. is -binary and goes by they/them, and has the power to generate individual crystalized snowflake-shaped shurikens. […] A post-ironic meditation on using violence to combat bullying.”
Post-ironic indeed!
marvel.com/articles/comics/int

Los mejores análisis políticos de en siempre vienen de , «egocrata», a través de . El último:
politikon.es/2020/05/25/inunda

Just listened to the last episode of the podcast. Quite a few interesting ideas there.
I disagree with a bunch. eg, I don't understand how (which are compulsory) could be called “solidarity” (which is voluntary by definition). And I'd remind & that some donate very little, or to irrelevant or self-aggrandizing causes — but that many others are in fact effective altruist.
On the positive, this conversation will make me question the merits of our meritocracy (pun intended), which doesn't seem to work as well as I assumed. And I think it'll help me find arguments to support my growing intuition that a cap on extreme individual may be morally justified and socially beneficial (I mean a 100% marginal tax rate for wealth above $10B or the like, ie affecting the truly super-rich only).
samharris.org/podcasts/205-fai

Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.