Show more

@cwh050 Who would click such a un-described link (just saying...)

@olives Sure but also I meant anything specifically you are looking at and was asking if you wanted to share specific context? (what you're looking)

(So not just the general idea / en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_tes)

Why film sequels and people don't work...

...because the more detail you add... the more...

█ offended viewer / receiver can become...

█ it wasn't what they though it was originally (it was nicer for them when it was ambiguous)

█ it becomes too complex or detailed

█ things are done in a time or feeling that can be lost or simply different (like a different film crew entirely or few essential employees were not there or there too much to reflect actual intended result).

█ what we see is not the reality (or there is more to it than the film or person we see). This can change the whole perception (of what we see as end result since we don't see early production or life of person or film before).

█ becomes more human or obvious someone is changing or developing the story - often people want it to "stay" as it is which means no change, which is sometimes impossible especially as things do tend to move or should be though films and people do like it to "stay the same" in memory or reality.

e.g. The forest i your childhood eventually dies... sad not just from using wood for fire or commercial logging but naturally some insects can come from time to time and clean out a forest.

)Disclaimer: above or original premise is not "all the time", but reliably in my experience and more often as human observation / calculation, more = these things above come in equation a lot more...)

Human Independence doesn't exist.

*Independence* = Freedom from control or influence of others.

Capitalism may just shift things so that you think you need others less but this way only ropes in / absorbs more dependence overall and often in a much longer dependent chain that is increasingly fragile or subject to takeover / power struggles.

Agree to Disagree / Agree what you can from what you can't
Move to next on The Agenda.
Do Loop.

( / the program of Life itself)

Enjoy / Aims of
(Together and as metaphor / simile):

I'm getting better playing Chess, although I think the aim of Chess and Life should be not just to win against people but improve them also as type of united sport (life) / yes competition in chess but to get better...

So you might need to believe in others (the premise of life perhaps) so you too can trust them not to cut off your head once you teach them the tricks (or know what to do for a less warring future if they switch on you).

This is why some people don't teach people things in life or chess - they don't want them to trap them - so they don't teach others to make sure (as in life too)... the final of the chess game (as in life) is to learn and teach but not punish / make others suffer and keep the sport of life going somehow... probably by saying "I don't wish you any harm" but let's enjoy this game all the while...

Relationships / Friendship Online: 99% can be good and then fails... Have you ever met the perfect communicator and then for some minor point it ends? 

I want to solve this because it's such a shame people simple can't move to the next point and continue as they did for a while... and even has stopped projects,,,

Have you ever met the perfect communicator and then for some reason or minor point it all stops as communication?... (often some emotional thing or some ultimatum)

Sometimes it's clear, usually some etiquette thing or expectation, but from similar people it seems really strange why on internet of all places people trust but then suddenly don't trust when getting a bit closer to them or simply sharing the same stuf but more focussed between 2 people... (same way they have been with others)

To give some example I was talking anonymously with a person who respects privacy but then suddenly (I think because we were going to work more on something) they wanted to know where I come from and where I was born (lol)

This is one example more baffling as we mentioned in topics long before the whole bigtech or bad ways or dangers... so seems clear...
I know for others online it could be many things behind less often emails, like smaller etiquette like signing "best regards" or NOT mentioning their name in emails can get you trouble... 🤣

My example was starting contact from 0 with similar person, knowledgable and happened over months of great talks and even audio recordings with their permission! (Imagine a person that can take all the YouTube video knowledge and give to you in 1 conversation like pure DMT into the brain) and then suddenly nothing because of an ultimatum or something like "being too close" as how I describe it...
Literally was said "I want to know who I'm talking to" and I was like
"All these months we did share everything else so can't you see all those things as well and continue, as well your own privacy type stuff in a different way for someone else, the same but slighting different to your privacy type stuff which is high in it's own way?"
(they just repeated their question over and over and in the end an ultimatum not to contact them without this... which I didn't give into and that was that".

I might release the audio for this as it was with their permission... but it's happening often I'm sure and a big hit to relationship or logic and trust from seemingly nothing (we are both good people so why we find such problems?)

It happens all across the board and all the time that I think you people know personally so that's why I'm asking you and collecting personally the logic / emotional intelligence over it.... (It's only for me).

It's seemingly not really logical or fair or I don't understand how someone similar can flip into this defensive mode suddenly...

I guess I could see they were like this from start but also with "I don't mean any harm" etc as their own motto I said I feel the same about and said prior (with explaining my situation etc) I don't get why people ditch people like this (other than learning themselves though you would think such high level see and even explain this to others!!!) and why they / we 2 people don't get to final steps of uniting is a bit beyond me.

Usually it's fear of trust like jumping off a ledge with someone like me who assures you they will catch you or that it's safe below, because the evidence, sharing and history together almost counts as 0 at the end point and not sure why!!...

Fascinating how we get to 99% or 99% rewarding communication and then might ditch over something small or seemingly big for the other - and then can't get past it using the 99% communication or previous 99% good times as memory...

Elephant seeing a mouse and thinking it's a big problem seems similar kind of metaphor... and then damages whole room / the relationship as a result of almost nothing...

Can you relate to any of this / share some light on it?

@olives And it's deliberate mostly or for example mixed / they are unaware or genuinely mean if for the children but use it with bad logic etc... (I'm also thinking how I would use it because I would have said or thought about the future in ways "for the children", so seems hold truth for me and perhaps others if not deliberate)...

@olives "Think of the children"

From the Wikipedia link en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Think_of and your comment I'm not sure which context you mean to "Remember" it as it seems to have many ways of use and how phrases has been used (for example referring to child labour, satirically repetition from that as logic fallacy / emotional leverage in arguments, maybe more things that I'm still reading and thinking about...)

So just asking: What did you mean?" from your one word post comment: "Remember" + link

(the comment isn't a post reply to anything if I click the post and doesn't have any other context attached to see what "Remember" means here).

@olives "summon your own loli to fight other people's lolis"

LOL'is 😃

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Bu (although I'm not generally into these things I still appreciate mostly the roots from the earlier born Anime / Manga and don't follow any longer or further but still appreciate)

Chasing "bugs" in a system... ["bugs" insects or code] 

@olives From what you said I saw "bugs" more as the insects in something - though it's probably not the the first time, it just was more clearly "bugs" that people want to "eliminate"...

and then I thought "what if bugs were part of trees (big programs) " that we accept have "bugs that are more as a feature than problem" (as long as it doesn't corrupt the whole program). Kind of like saying "part of everything, it's not perfect and perhaps like eco-system needs a bit of imperfection....

There is an obvious difference between the comparison of digital and biological 'imperfection' or perfection but I thought that above a certain standard "bugs will always be part of the eco-system" <--- to some level...
hmmm - maybe I feel sorry for the "bugs" in code like I would insects lol but it's more the perfection / imperfection I guess I mean that will always be part of life or best to live with it than over-spend energy ironing it all out?

@olives Do you have something specific you mean or specific context?

@mapto @fuck_cars
description for most "Managers" :blobrofl:

“He comes in, shits all over us, and then leaves.”

-former Tesla Manager

@olives THIS IS BIG NEWS

BECAUSE BANKING IS A BIG ROOT FOR OUR WHOLE LIFE / EXISTENCE...

reclaimthenet.org/jp-morgan-ch
"The largest US bank, and the world’s largest by capitalization, JP Morgan Chase, is going forward with another way to monetize their clients – by giving access to their spending data to be used for targeted ads."

Show more
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.