Show newer
#FreeSchool ⬅️ (see hashtag)

🔈 Audio Clip 🔈 about "First they came for the..."

He was a willing Nazi but then rejected on grounds (Church vs. State stuff) and later as a went around spreading how he his inaction or indifference spells doom for everyone and why things needed to be done differently now else it would ome back around to them... 🔁

🔈 Original Source: 🔈
encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content

+ /

of

of

4 Keywords / vocabulary related to and Genocide:

➡️ indifference
➡️ inaction
➡️ passivity
= ➡️ complicity :nes_fire:

Martin Niemoeller's is an example of people who supported the Nazis for a long while (LIKE SUPPORTING FOR SOME PEOPLE LET'S SAY AS MODERN TYPE OF )
and then later *after actually meeting allegedly) he flips to realise "no...." it's not the way ...

and are different and hostile made it so clear at the time...

Many people or people around the world didn't say a word and even killed against others (even worse dobbed Jewish people or reported (to let others kill them!).

They themselves also might have perished which is maybe accordingly to the of which the outcome is the same when repeating the bad work and just finding new targets to suppress or blame. I

A system of eating itself..
People put against other people (as competition in business or other types of war / extraction / money-making fastest).

- LINK 1 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_th...

- LINK2 (AUDIO VERSION) encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content

TLDR = Niemöller's belief was that Germans had been complicit through their silence in the Nazi imprisonment, persecution, and murder of millions of people.

This has a nice audio version of softer wiki-like page. I've put this on my Mastodon and maybe attached it if I remember. Excellent for people to hear often to stop encroaching criminalization of every single sector and type of person

==============================================
PEOPLE CAN'T EXPECT GOVERNMENT TO CHANGE AT ALL OR BEG FOR LOVE FROM THEM CONSTANTLY !!!! IT'S THEIR SELF-GIVEN JOBS TO SCREW PEOPLE!
==============================================

Political policies and campaigns are often based on taking away 'certain' freedoms and then slowly taking away all of them.

of

is what is done to you basically - just a bit more 'diplomatically' so it causes less of a scene and instead do it step by step like that behind your back while at your at work, getting closer all the while to their ideal scenario from the start... Total control.

Someone should literally plot all these changes to see how it's part of the same patterns and historically going towards the same crushing control / reducing of and .

0
#FreeSchool ⬅️ (see hashtag)

Political policies and campaigns are often based on taking away 'certain' freedoms and then slowly taking away all of them.

of

is what is done to you basically - just a bit more 'diplomatically' so it causes less of a scene and instead do it step by step like that behind your back while at your at work, getting closer all the while to their ideal scenario from the start... Total control.

Someone should literally plot all these changes to see how it's part of the same patterns and historically going towards the same crushing control.

0
#FreeSchool ⬅️ (see hashtag)

@messaroundmarx Feel free to DM me or create a new thread to also solve that for you.

For example create a new thread and let me know so we're not disturbed and even paste things in again from here... What do you think?

0
#FreeSchool ⬅️ (see hashtag)

@freemo @messaroundmarx Interesting. I notice 2 things.

1/ I'm possibly falling into that typical bashing of "Capitalism" maybe because I'm not getting what I want related to the other parts of life I want and responsibility of many systems which Capitalism doesn't seem to help with - at all (at least the Modern kind).

Ideally I'd like to think, involves or implement (towards various things), Saving , Increasing / , / being part of it but not I don't see these words a lot or at all in Capitalism or books. So maybe I blame it or anyone that uses it overly (which I don't think can only be blamed on (people but the design too).

So the name is one thing but also I'm just a bit more concerned / defending what these words ignore / over-write / replace with numbers or mathematical tricks frankly.

YOU CAN SKIP TO 2ND POINT FOR NOW AND NEXT HORIZONTAL LINES...
and come back here if you have the taste for it... above as the main point 1
======================================

Caring about what people think is not just a number for example or free-market. All this 'other stuff' not in systems seems to me actively cutting it out (again said or not said).
And after that many things like Authoritarianism are exactly what you get as result of or mostly physical / material ways of looking at life / extraction of it etc. There's more than that, hence Capitalism limited (of course but used by people deliberately so for that and evolving to crush people).

❓ Is it possible to have and with Capitalism?
Maybe. But not fully it seems.

❓ Does Capitalism mean banks and debt-based system creates debt mostly first and therefore negative propelled polarity / not positive in the other humans sense? Seems so.

❓ What it is Capitalism heading towards in terms of facilitating religion / beliefs / caring of various kinds never just 1 as a whole number or limited attribute / bigger spectrum of attributes?

Holding *Modern Capitalism* responsible seems relative - or those who are responsible for using it as rolling steam-roller of things

If prefers to ignore or lacks participation on human levels then it can reflect how much it is like a x y or z type system.

Finance or number-looking perspectives are close to for me as the whole story is looking at people for profit / pimping / working them without diversity in mind (just for money) and other moral transactions is less there / non-existent. What it means to people locally, nature, seems a bit too encompassing as a system to involves but if we agree people are largely not part of the equation (only material and physical type intellect used once it's gained) then it seem play less of a part in life even though part of it physically.

IF free-market Capitalism involves not caring about or even assume we can do free-market selling the planet then perhaps for me it infers selling people or planet is ok - which seems wrong... at least without a whole other balance...

I'm defending what other people might feel ok with even by their God or just what exists today as a result of leverage to make people work (throttling for maximising gain) and could exist more towards making it free / pre=paid than for any kind of mass profit / screwing people to the wall to work for Capitalism. Imagnie most of the profit could pay for the many.

❓ Is Capitalism part of a rolling class of similar people or positions and keeping their position?

So I'm reviewing those things as "Capitalism" while at the same time it is is all probably asking a bit too much from language when it's a whole bunch of things.

========================================
2ND POINT

2/ At the same time of accepting inaccuracy or differences I feel like it's bad overall and not as neutral as you're talking about - almost 'another' kind of definition or free-market Capitalism definition, which surely exists, but in today's sense I'm not sure it does any more and not as embedded as it is today - so *just* the more static or classical past definition sure, but the practical usage today ( ignoring planetary limits, increasingly number representations NOT representing people properly or planet, animal-lovers, maybe / at the expense of a business perspectives that Capitalism might have ( or simply might ignore and not declare as limits, assuming Infinite Growth, taking from other markets ok etc)... Can seem less related to Capitalism and 'maybe' not Capitalism's fault but it's part of how people use it... so it is different today both how it's used and what it is.

Today's version being tied to everything I feel which could frame the classical sense(s) of the word Capitalism differently and is not isolated any more - literally everything is increasingly weaponised FOR Capitalism or 'as' Capitalism itself is evolving and is / or becoming under or whatever let's say aggression or over-ruling personal beliefs, territorial eating of other's resources (or many things Capitalism is part of but might seem completely 'optional' to reader of the dictionary). People have and fall into a definite program whichever way it seems you look at it to do a set type of patterns at the expense of almost 'these thing' almost never. Why not? Largely the answer is that it's geared for very different things, not happiness or end-game for future children, it looks upon people and things well almost the same - just a thing to kick around and find sweet spot of demand and supply MINI-GAMES which make a bit of a mockery at the end.

Anyway some robust questions - all that is about caring and not sure how much you're into that.

So...

- Could the definition of Capitalism you had in mind change with time?

- How about if Capitalism is used as a sub-set to Authoritarianism ?
Would repackaging make it different weapon be totally innocent like a trigger for a gun or not always for bullets but similar?

A strong repackage of Capitalism or forced-evolution tree (Like most functioning or treated like an ) makes it a different animal overall and from birth - despite it being ok once as a component on it's own (but also server architecture changing). All these change / renders the definition, relativity and practical implementation different today even if still the same 'basic principle'.

1
#FreeSchool ⬅️ (see hashtag)

@boblaw0 Ok thanks for info.

Is there also any way to do it without fiddling with router - maybe a direct app and preferably one that isn't invasive and doesn't need to store data ?

So app would help mostly just access each other's disk or directory, and not actually needs storage elsewhere.

0
#FreeSchool ⬅️ (see hashtag)

"If i do something wrong, or step on your toes, please let me know in DMs so i can do better.

If we are mutuals, and i do something you don't like, let me know in DMs.:"

💬 by @boblaw0
Full Post: mstdn.social/@boblaw0/11358114

0
#FreeSchool ⬅️ (see hashtag) boosted
boblaw0

- open mastodon
- favorite and boost some posts
- reply to some posts
- ramp up the boosting and replying
- get overwhelmed
- stop using mastodon for a day and a half
- repeat

0
#FreeSchool ⬅️ (see hashtag)

@freemo @messaroundmarx There are 2 quotes here.
I assume it's the 2nd quote mostly about authoritarianism that is mostly the focus...

...which, if so, would you consider authority or authoritarianism as an uncaring (or almost financially-only caring) Bank and State Authority as the kind of dictator(s) or de-facto equivalent (i.e. without you totally using Bank or State then you are a mere nothing deliberately made increasingly conditional, whether they declare themselves as this or that political label.

Those two (or just for the purposes of this reply) are sole rulers and sources of life (or monopoly of it) and soon imprisoning people for non-conforming reasons (more examples of kangeroo / asked to evidence / terrorism chargers used on Twitter / Mastodon style social people silences and in jail / mothers arrested fpr speaking etc)...

So theoretically or de-facto would you agree Modern (or just today's type of actions and non-action of Banks 🏦 and State 👮 (whatever we call their actions as) is requiring these two authorities and not just the softer or neutral types of Capitalism.

The increasing and demanding to (or take it or leave life if you want) makes increasingly everything or incompatible by default and today's kind of Capitalism is more orientated...

Capitalism here as a constantly changing or added / which is why we can not just focus on like Authoritarianism but the and track / , as well as what they (), how they have things failed constantly in echange for profit / power etc etc, that contribute to similar things...

As part of constant systematic pattern (whatever we call that) and even considering people being also (yes), but definitely no change to that model of as usual. Namely , etc.

And on the other side more positive to humans, today it's hardly about between and people, giving power to people, talking about well-being of humans, which I'd include as part of what makes it "Authoritarian style" behaviour also when it's without those components and considerations... would you agree?

Happy New Year by the way :)

1
#FreeSchool ⬅️ (see hashtag)

@floppy Would / still work without update?

I know there is a fork or newer "Oku" but I think isn't ready yet for use... okubrowser.github.io/

0
#FreeSchool ⬅️ (see hashtag) boosted
*
Yung_Rotwelsch

okubrowser.github.io/

Beaker Browser was a Chromium-based Web browser that incorporated the Dat protocol with the primary aim of enabling peer-to-peer static site sharing. To this end, Oku is similar; in fact, Beaker Browser was part of the inspiration to create Oku. The two projects diverge in their long-term ambitions, however; (...)

Hyped 🔥

#p2p #beaker #beakerbrowser #scuttlebutt #dat #okubrowser #oku

1
#FreeSchool ⬅️ (see hashtag)


Why can't you just see my computer files using my IP address and very little else? ❓

(assume I don't mind or just for a friend I trust or I've shared files deliberately with a password protected directory or even want random people to visit) ❓

on a postcard / message...

0
#FreeSchool ⬅️ (see hashtag)

@tetrislife Oh yeah "directory" can have multiple-meanings: You got it right that I mean files on my computer is my ideal to internet...

Thanks for replying.

I'll take look at

What is crazy is why I can't just 'share with the world' my directory (even in a dangerous / open way) from something 'shared' my side while my computer is running!

might have something... but even installing anything seems crazy for random peoplewho want to pop by my IP or what I could give them as newest connection...

I think Open 12 or something had something useful but not sure how...

Why can't you just see my computer files using IP address? (if no firewalls installed etc)

0
#FreeSchool ⬅️ (see hashtag)

Truth is you don't know a lot and can't...

because it's all so distant and deliberately remote - so the answer is to do things you are also more sure of yourselves...
because:

- you were not there for a lot of history which is a rolling history hard to catch up on all the contexts
- someone else told you something - and even while some truth has many perspectives.
- people are paid to say things
- people are paid to be silent too when signing NDA's (Non-Disclosure Agreements)
- it's almost all opinion
- It's not always relative to you directly - so although you might care, when you're in another country, the news isn't always relative - so news is just a it's own bubble even if they promise global domination - just there's a limit.
- a lot is almost only hype and simply spread so other people cam spread it and occupy time and drive up eye-balls 👀 and adverts 📶 (people like you maybe
- A lot asn't happened or they are gauging response and resistance to it and may not happen in the way people are told / advertised / voting for
- there is a lot of from who or where information comes from...

And much more...

And to conclude...

sticking to yourself WHILE being aware is more tangibly going to fix things because it's what your mind and body can touch and do... and that eventually fixes things if others do things also a bit more from their own power - more than just chasing Trump news (i.e. wasting their time / not using it to further something or positive ...

themselves.

0
#FreeSchool ⬅️ (see hashtag)

&

"They want you to “” and drive the dollar revenue up."

💬 by @localden

Post from: Be A Property Owner And Not A Renter On The Internet

den.dev/blog/be-a-property-own

0
#FreeSchool ⬅️ (see hashtag)

@tetrislife @roland And without servers / on my own is it possible?

1
#FreeSchool ⬅️ (see hashtag)

@debby Louis Rossmann is great and videos solid ➡️ yewtu.be/channel/UCl2mFZoRqjw_

0
#FreeSchool ⬅️ (see hashtag) boosted
Debby ‬⁂📎🐧:disability_flag:

📣 Attention all custom ROM users and advocates for digital rights! 📣

Google's Play Integrity is limiting access to certain functionalities and applications for those using custom operating systems. This is a direct attack on the open-source community and a step towards further consolidating Google's monopoly in the mobile ecosystem.

The European Commission is aware of the situation, but has deemed it a low priority: europarl.europa.eu/doceo/docum

It's time for us to take action and show Google and the EU how much we care about this issue! 💥

Sign the petition now to stop Google from limiting access to custom ROMs: change.org/p/stop-google-from-

#StopGoogleMonopoly #CustomROMs #DigitalRights #OpenSource #PlayIntegrity #Google #deGoogle #privacy #right2repair #rightorepair #r2r #EU

Let's unite and fight for our right to use and develop custom operating systems! 💪

1+
#FreeSchool ⬅️ (see hashtag)

@tetrislife @roland Just to clarify - Can I share a directory in Windows and have that available to people on the internet - even for a short time (say for a friend just for few minutes) and even if really slow ❓

0
#FreeSchool ⬅️ (see hashtag)

@trom Can I share a directory in Windows and have that available to people on the internet - even for a short time (say for a friend just for few minutes) ❓

0
#FreeSchool ⬅️ (see hashtag)

@320x200 Can I share a directory in Windows and have that available to people on the internet - even for a short time (say for a friend just for few minutes) ❓

0
Show older

#FreeSchool ⬅️ (see hashtag)'s choices:

freeschool

420

ai

130

invidious

67

podcast

58

jobs

51

jitsi

37

dnb

27

fosdem2022

12

occupy

6

zapatista There is nothing here!

0
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.

Trending now

Resources

Developers

What is Mastodon?

qoto.org

More…

v3.5.19-qoto · Privacy policy