Show newer

to sum it up life...

💬 Gilgwath @gilgwath

@bodhipaksa It seems that everyday I read a new about how some part of the , care, or s#ystem is just a madhouse where people are trying to the funnel the greatest amount of into their own pockets. 🫣 How can this function? 🤯

💬 Will Denny (he/they)
@wjd

that is how it functions. Before it was a it was . It's still a massive and project, just with it's own and now.

📋 Post:
social.tchncs.de/@gilgwath/113

around etc

@bodhipaksa

📋 Text version, not just Alt text...

To everyone in a similar scenario: the tactic my doctor's office has taught me is to ask, in writing, for:

1) the name, board specialty, and license number of the making the determination the was not necessary;

2) copies of all materials they relied on to make their determination;

3) proof the doctor making the determination has maintained registration in your specific state and of their meeting all their continuing ;

4) the aggregate rate at which similar treatments are denied vs approved by the specific doctor being used for peer review.You are not entitled by to *all* of these things in most , but you're entitled to some of them, and you can always ask for them.

This is, she says, a wildly successful tactic, because if the insurance c#ompany answers them honestly, it gives you that the"doctors" making these determinations are practicing out of scope, without proper and , in areas they are not competent in.

Everyone knows this is true; it's not a secret in any way. But it's in violation of a number of regulations, and a LOT of times the company will just give up and pay the bill rather than handing you proof they're violating the regs. It's a tactic that has worked for me many, many times.

rahaeli on Bluesky posts the above.

Explained...

from @freemo conversations in digestible bullet points...

💬 ✒️ Capitalism (free markets), in it's correct meaning, is not a rule so much as an ideological guideline, and in reality should be in a of many things, where is only an of *some* things (not all).

💬 ✒️ We don't live in a country that is a pure capitalism, or even much of a capitalism at all...
Right now we don't have free markets, and that's the point.

💬 ✒️ Not only is it not a free market, but it is quite far away from being one.

All-in- version...

💬 ✒️ We also shouldn't strive for capitalism (free markets) as the default, it's not a rule so much as an ideological guideline, and the reality should be a mix of many things, where capitalism is only an influence.

=====================
3 Capitalism (free markets) Tips:
=====================

☑️ is a way of doing things as a guideline - and not for everything to be done in this way.

☑️ Capitalism isn't a binary word to say government is or isn't Capitalism since it's mixed.

☑️ probably as better word.

as a best word to replace Capitalism maybe.

Capitalism perhaps does not mention the rich explicitly -
specifically the rich is perhaps more what people mean sometimes! 💰 🤑

(Plutocracy = governed by the people)

Perhaps "Capital" in the word also helps people not see or assume centralization rather than the many versions, including Free Market version which is important next to the word as a kind of sub-type of it"

🔗 Capitalism (free markets)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_mar

@freemo EXCELLENT this was very helpful... Thank you x10

I feel I reached a milestone.

Almost like a computer game reaching a new level / milestone with a new trophy awarded lol 🏆 (thanks to you)

Optionally more below or whenever. (the rest is skippable / most for myself):

🔴 2 questions (only 1st line needed to read)

Q1 🔴 Any successful examples you think you'd include in Capitalism's positive influence ?

❌ Hospitals are a SUPER example of what not to involve with theory 💯 Because people will pay anything for their own health.

(I also perhaps think this about EVERYTHING lol - maybe we should provide for all kinds in the same way we can't even Supply and Demand ruining those things we need - shelter, food, water etc).

Q2 🔴 Why do you think people seem to stick to this word Capitalism and use it to represent when it isn't 'Capitalism'

"Capitalism" as a word seems to make the word itself an offensive adjective word / or just something like a way of government itself in people's mind...

Anything clarifying on the reason why people get this signal or stay in it appreciated...

====================
THANK YOU THANK YOU...
This rest of this post below is only an echo / rewrite of what you said before as bullet points I can remember... ✒️

====================

For people these 2 helps to say:

Capitalism (free markets)

☑️ Is a mix of things it influences as a way of doing them as a guideline - not just 1 thing.

☑️ Isn't a binary thing that something like a government is or isn't.

☑️ Use Capitalistic or

Perhaps people mean Capitalistic or what you said as being a better word (perhaps deliberately not mentioned in mainstream!)

(Plutocracy = governed by the people)

====================

⬇️ The rest below is a copy as bullet points for myself and others if interested / might help them in essays etc: ⬇️

====================

as bullet points:

✒️ While Capitalism (free markets) should be the default for sure, it's not a rule so much as an ideological , and the reality should be a of many things, where capitalism is only an .

✒️ Capitalism is an ideology among many ideologies that should the way you a , but not be seen as a hard rule.

✒️ We don't live in a country that is a pure capitalism, or even much of a capitalism at all... You are right we **don't** have free markets, that's the point.

✒️ Not only is it not a free market, but it is quite far away from being one.

✒️ We also shouldn't strive for capitalism (free markets) as the default, its not a rule so much as an ideological guideline, and the reality should be a mix of many things, where capitalism is only an influence.

Excellent stuff.

vs.

💬 "... healthcare shouldn't exist in a free market system because the laws of supply and demand break down since a person would pay anything (usually) to live one more healthy day."

@freemo

Full post: qoto.org/@freemo/1137874628651


with

Capitalism seems to need / involve all these extended things ...which seem to change it's definition... 

@freemo I seem to get a lot of what is said or written instantly...

but lose it the very moment it comes to the scope or reality of Capitalism's role in life *today* or say last 100 years (Industrial Revolution being early 1900's perhaps).

So...
❓ Are we in a period of Capitalism?

❓ How does it successfully work to its own definition within the today or be seen clearly in the past on larger scale?

Example:
You mention the "me and you" example of doing a trade without rules and force- PERFECT- But the reality today is the opposite - there are rules and force beyond the 1 time deal and anything more regular between us is wanting to be regulated or punished (basically)... or within more people difficult.

Which is why the public might miss how it works and perhaps in a mixed system which part is or isn't Capitalism.

So seeking clarity on that with some very obvious questions helps see what it is (or is not).

❓ So are we in Capitalism?

The sense of Free-Market in small sense seems to make sense, but confuses me after any of the larger cases beyond cold definitions - So anything trying for more than theory or more than small scope is troublesome. It's almost like

❓ How can Capitalism not involve all these other extended things, because it seems quite impractical or non-existent without them.

For example - If you look at Free Market pages or almost anywhere for description (ok I didn't look everywhere but feel free to give examples) - it seems Capitalism NEEDS to involve all these other extended things more than just the basic theory and extends into talking about a litter of things,

like:

⏺️ **owners** of wealth,
⏺️ **property** or production ability in capital and **financial** markets
⏺️ maybe some government intervention (although not planning to start out that way so much it 'can' involve it).

So if financial markets are relative those Capitalistic things seem it seems it is or touches on things like:

⏺️ Stock markets,
⏺️ Commodity markets,
⏺️ Money markets
⏺️ Derivatives markets,
⏺️ Futures markets,
⏺️ Interbank lending market ( etc)

Endlessly touching on more on more things (or else rendering itself impractical almost).

This seems to mean any scope outside of me and you, or in the context for today is not really possible and always need all these satellite things! 🛰️ 🪐

==========
SUMMARY:

Hope that explains the confusion or loop that is happening.
I feel like I could crack why sooooo many fall back into problems with this by asking.

Any more clarifying examples of what Capitalism is and isn't more than you and I appreciated.

Link below is only reference for reminding myself where we started conversation:
qoto.org/@freeschool/113764906

#Capitalism for #Women - Ending sexual division ? 

💬 is the first which makes it possible for working-class to imagine an end to the of .

➡️ Source from + 's role in its emergence
📋 from LibCom.org
libcom.org/article/primitive-c

⬇️ More from PDF below: ⬇️

💬 How can the study of human origins clarify our view of a future communist society?

tells us that is the first human society which makes it possible to imagine an end to the sexual division of labour, and equality for women – an which is today set in law in a few countries, but which is nowhere an equality in fact: “while capitalism has neither nor women’s lot as such, it is by contrast the first which has made it possible to pose the question of their equality with men; and although it has proved unable to make this equality a reality, it has nonetheless brought together the elements which will bring it into being”.[25]

Despite itself, capitalism has given working-class , for the first time in the of class , a real material from men, and hence the possibility of taking part on an footing with men in the struggle for the liberation of the , and so of as a whole.

#Capitalism means... "markets are free, meaning everyone has the same amount of power in the market, no one can game the system"... 

💬 means...
"markets are free, meaning everyone has the same amount of power in the market, no one can game the system"

by @freemo
Post: qoto.org/@freemo/1137689315863

💬 My comment:
Typically "Capitalism" seems to be said in public to mean "money rules and everyone is driven by greed",
... when in reality it means something else according to that I'm exploring / currently trying to re-learn.

Initially I think it's both things or many things since there is so much nuance of Capitalism and something evolving even from the basic definition. It seems it's not just 1 solid dictionary or Wikipedia definition - it's many pages! Again many nuances or ways doesn't seem to help although in a static moment away from today I get parts of it

💖 ➡️ FEELINGS VS. LOGIC... ⬅️ 💔
I have massive and crossed wires about "Capitalism" ⚔️ and below I list some of those feelings bullet pointed with 🔴

"Capitalism" is like my brain in a skipping CD 💿 or Vinyl Record 🔴 that stays in the same track whenever you try play it or talk about a topic... I might understand some logic but can't agree with much of it's perception or 'who-knows-who' that made it (many).

Looking at the page "Free-Market Capitalism" page makes me think to myself:

💬 "What do I actually agree with here? Anything?
Answer: Not much! Have to find something I can agree with!"

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_mar

Check how you feel compared to how I feel (disclaimer: I might still not 'get it' but this is how I feel)...

🔴 Selling / Re-selling the planet 🌏 ? ❌ Na. ❌

That's like an illegal operation or incompatible way of looking it it sometimes. What's a beautiful bird worth?
For people "trying" to convert to numbers (deliberately fucking things like money-changer or innocently trying to manage things) it's totally like difference sciences and false measurement (even without assuming and f-ing are just to tax and skim off people behind their backs and re-loan / dilute the money behind our backs too, devaluing it at their benefit!). WTF!
More numbers / more debt?

🔴 Owning things - should anyone own things more than apportioning it to the next person / generation - ok a piece of paper for saying that - but a buying complicated pieces of paper as a program or scheme to enrich the system again (taz) / cheating people out of shelter and the future eventually? (No! Too risky even to consider)

🔴 Pricing people labour / Future children priced? Can it ever be fair? Can't we just accept people and almost hope they do for the love of things?

Despite me not have whole answer for this either - just not selling our self either falsely/arbitrarily and trying to falsely value all different arts which banks and state have no care about (dying artists constantly). Either as numbers or anything more than caring for it and allowing the education of that... ?
And the 10 chickens / children have feelings and not just the number 10 to kill and use from them throw away.
Much more than numbers please. Giving life AND love (something often not mentioned in growing life.) Selling is mainly like a empty vehicle to constantly find something to empty and fill again without care and encourages lack of quality and more physical moving things more than a meta look.
What about love as the process too - why not that?

🔴 "competitive markets", a price system?
Doesn't it end all the same bad way and never stays how it was intended to start?

🔴 "exchange of rights (cf. ownership) of services and goods" kind of ok but can't we keep things more often rather than commodifying it to commercialise it - just nice little homes and small economy with big serving them in it's own small / less chemical crap ways.

🔴 "Markets" has so much variation / too much - renders this whole definition of free-market useless on first look / too open to interpretation and change.

🔴 Economics - a terrible word perhaps from the perspective of who is taking care of the land / planet and people (government) who's job is really care of itself and use people as batteries which are disposable ? Governments that took the land but don't really share it to future generations and just want more bad and even increasingly looking to take more land !
(how it got to this point was by stealing or conquering it so why continue that? Who wants to forever re-sell it for more and more never-ending problems with it, not letting people actually inherit it)

=====================
OK THAT'S ENOUGH
...FOR NOW!
=====================

SO YEAH I'm fighting off the same Capitalism feeling that I get tempted back into think, like a skipping CD 💿 or Vinyl Record 🔴 that stays in the same track whenever you try play it or talk about a topic...
Not fun and slipping into the same feeling for what seems 100% an over-flexible definition for " Capitalism" which of course encourages people to take any part they want from it - since it's ALL OF IT!!

If we are to use words indeed to think they mean 1-10 things that would be great, just not 100 things will any you like!!!

(I will continue learning today and seems to come up often with many people on this hashtag!) 😃 😅

Internet sites being lost / overwritten + harder to

📼 The Old Internet is Crumbling...
:youtube: yewtu.be/watch?v=EUQiP38zRS4&t
⏲️ 8mins LMG Channel


> ?

@simon_brooke @localden It's ok if you're the short-talking type or if talking more just depressed you (or anything similar).

Mainly I wanted to add the is not possible once born into it - so needs actively undoing too. Can't say no because you need the bad providers of life (energy, banks, money, work, food, etc)...
It's not nice we have bad 'parents' for providers providing us excuses to do more bad work... but now we know we need to do something more about it like preparing people to be able to talk and team together more than hate or leave snarky comments. People that can give a chance for positive things to grow rather than spread those things the Leader want us to feed each other and occupy our time from finding things that work - namely ability to talk and spending more time with each other solving our own things / making friendships etc...

Try to reply. And make time for more - else it's perhaps not the planting of mind 🌱 🧠 🌱 and heart 💖 🌅

@phocks Sounds like movement is happening even just in this thread - So what's the plan? - I'm listening :)

@phocks Sound like movement is happening J -
So what's the plan - I'm listening :)

if your reason for trying to imagine the future is, at least in part, to invent it

then you cannot afford to imagine a future that simply ignores bad things in the present

because these problems require actual solutions, and naive approaches are likely to make them worse

@simon_brooke @localden Sure I get that. But which angle are you coming from?

So it can be seen in many ways, like those mentioned about

- the consideration on how to achieve our goals... moving things between us, selling, community

- infrastructure (sure it's etc BUT it does seems we are changing that or able to go back to the protocols that is the basic component of all of it and make it ours somewhat or not fully jump in bed with those types and simply make all existing hardware last as long as possible without buying into it too quickly...

So many ways to look at it - wondering what's yours related to this ?

Do you see it totally not possible / impossible or can we transition out of it a bit minimally using things meanwhile?

Things to solve: #fuckery #enshitification #shitshow #trump hating... 

Things to solve - a overall short list! To solve...




etc (people hating... etc)

So overall instead of spending time on hating / *spreading* shit news Trump knows you're going to repeat - increment YOUR work or finding answers / making OUR own friendships / working YOUR OWN personal life and projects...

Eventually WITH others it seems using all that time better means we work for us NOT against them by repeating the same sort of stuff...

💬 Lesson to learn...
Sometimes when you hate and don't promote answers or promote yourself, then all we're left with is the knee-jerk hate...

Happy to hear from you more personally.

& etc

"Running infrastructure for yourself is hard...

Running infrastructure for others is exponentially harder."

💬 from @localden
Page: den.dev/blog/be-a-property-own

Continued... (hashtags added for )

"As any forum moderator or administrator can attest, the sheer volume of , , and just generally can wear down even the most seasoned veterans of the .com era.

And that’s if we’re talking about that tens of thousands of users. Scale that to a few million and there won’t be enough hours in the day to either keep the servers running (stuff is costly too) or to monitor the content for anything potentially harmful or inappropriate.

For anyone that wants to start a , it’s a no-brainer that they should probably start somewhere where they can “” the hard things, like moderation and infrastructure, to someone who is an expert and has built-in mechanisms to handle everything in-house. Especially when the funds for this are at or around zero dollars. That’s a totally reasonable stance to take, and I absolutely get the rationale there.

Not only that, but a lot of the existing ecosystems rest on the shoulders of network effects.

Once everyone you care about is on , are you really going to be the only one not on Reddit and try to your own little corner for a specific community? Probably not, and attracting people there would be much harder. Reddit is the one-stop-shop - I can go there for woodworking advice, but I can also chat in communities, or communities around collecting , with the same account and within the same interface. Are you really going to post of your fridge that you want to on your blog and hope that in a year someone discovers it through a Google search? Of course not - you will go to or and get it sold within a few days.

You, the , are going to go where most people are, because you’re optimizing for your , such as finding like-minded individuals or the fridge quickly and getting it out of your garage to make room for a table saw.

Most people are this way - they don’t care who or how maintains or runs a community or network as long as that place solves the problems they set out to solve. When that overlaps with the company’s desire to make money, you end up in somewhat of a goldilocks zone, but that’s typically a short-lived experience with services. More on that shortly."

... 💬 Continue reading more here:
den.dev/blog/be-a-property-own

1/ Great will re-read this thread over and over today to see if I can crack it... honestly a bit strange... 2/ Encouraging more of the same / expanding QOTO investing in people 

@freemo Will be re-reading this thread over and over today as obviously I am or was rather oblivious / lost - it's kind of concerning and seems easily common.

I think this is something worthy to do and what QOTO could be good at as a mor dedicated server - making a business of kindly hammering back people's wrong thoughts / training them to think better / methods / spotting holes in thought and helping people come out of what is like a skipped record much like rascism against Capitalism rather blindly.

So just a quick read and reply about that. I'll try work on it but seem all needs a "complete re-build" as my "thought engine" or way I do things!! Shocking yes! But thanks.. :)

Another quick mention is that, mentioning the previous person (and perhaps bashing a bit) seems kinda asking for trouble :) or at least could remove the @ because it was obvious they didn't want to talk to you and you knew already their level so could weigh the potential by not encouraging or removing @ in name as I knew who you meant... (would've be enough to say their name without sending them notification message basically). But anyway you know best but is just as a kind of consideration of the usage of your time I know you value and what the person said already... :)

2/ ... I have to conclude as a bigger point from that that you / freemo does want to teach / educate people genuinely!
(This is great / it's great value / worthy time and helps people)

So I'd like you to do that as your business / full time work which you do somewhat but more officially. The change and quality of people is very tangible (other work people do doesn't really change people and we're left with same-same of even crap people like me, so that is somewhat a big potential). People honestly pay for being told how they are wrong lol...

So I think we need to invest in people more personally / manually to adjust back what people and systems have leave out to change (people) so we learn how to learn maybe in certain big holes of thought.

Investing in others for real substantial change - person to person (P2P) or QOTO seems perfect as you named it already not me! And just need something around it.

A business model / eco-system around that would be so cool and your tendencies seem to match / reflect that - even if it's not the main thing but you are the Captain naturally it seems to go diving with or making some kind of better school!

The eventual product being better people in the world / more examples of how to get there / learning on steroids or more directly more personal whipping of people which is what the world wants / needs instead of being left to their own echo chambers / twitter system.

It's something I've said before but just comes around again and gain so seems so natural and aligned already to the morality you hold and demonstrate (so many time seen you list things well) so what better to spread QOTO and re-use that!

The business of making better people / assisting things...

Food for thought - honestly !

#2025 <3 🥇

Capitalism - How to distinguish the differences and typical mistakes? Good sources for seeing what it is or claims to be (or is indeed neutral about) ? Because reading is not always clear or relies on my own interpretation of nuances, which clearly hasn't been the best so far. . And comparing things not easy... Maybe a detailed comparison chart / Better method not just rely on just myself to discern it all - I'm limited in working it out alone so is there a better method other than people telling me like you did in reply to what I say and correcting me?... 

@freemo Cool. So what words do you think I should use for my definition.

And then how to avoid this - I can see myself like a scratched record falling back into it... because I think many others are also not as educated or good with nuances? (kinda funny but if lots of people think it's the same then they can agree incorrectly)

The use of this word is for me to know what I mean and then also for others to know - so it's kind of a vicious cycle! -
Although I am using the word incorrectly / inaccurately, ironically others / we know what I . they mean and share similar dislike in the things I listed along the way in reply to you.

I can see how people might naturally never come out of these proper definitions because the feelings are almost right to them or others (oppression or cheating of some kind, lack of power or some meta way to see it) and even if the words they use are not great we can agree on 'wrong' or 'right' in some way.

So if this is the case how / what can I say better than Capitalism?

Do you have a got to source to differential these things easier or step by step rather than reading Wiki page mass and relying on just my discerning the nuances

(I think this is a really big problem and seem even those 'father' who have spent half their life studying it all STILL they find if hard to differentiate!!!) LOOOOL

I might have to accept my limits and find proper ways - rather than rely on myself to differentiate using the same ways and doing hit and miss methods.

Knowing what it is not is also good like FAQ page with lots of crosses. The conversation we've had saying it's not this, not that, is actually more useful but demands humans work on other humans to get them out of the same old thoughts like 'skipped records' repeating and needing help to switch tracks.

See things as anti-this or pro-that and neutral / unsaid would be good.

So thanks for this talk.

A few questions to wrap is the over question and mini points here so I can continue on a better trajectory and even 'teach' others on a better way to distinguish as a better reference or step by step way. Any ideas?

Thanks!

Show older

#FreeSchool ⬅️ (see hashtag)'s choices:

Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.