#Identitypolitics does not promote #diversity.
"Táíwò’s project is reclamation. “It’s a starting point,” he said of the concept’s original use. “It’s compatible with working on common problems with people from other identity groups.”"
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/olufemi-taiwo-identity-politics-elite-capture.html
I've always considered #identity, much like #knowledge, an #individual's own, personal, tacit, unique attribute, evolved through a lifetime and representing the history of all social interactions they had with their environment.
I find the modern #identitytheory focus on the many #social "identities" (father, golfer, employee, etc ...) one has during the day, wrong.
In my view, these are just external #roles one assumes and plays in different #systems they are part of. They may define #what an individual is but not #who they are.
In fact, I believe that it is #who an individual is that affect #how they do #what they do in the role they are given.
I also consider the largely accepted academic #theory presented in the attached document as the direct cause of our present dysfunctional society marred by #identitypolitics.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314243231_The_Development_of_Identity_Theory
I just realized something very powerful.....
I am sitting here, in my office, at a company I own a large chunk of, running the entire company, all because I made the discovery of a lifetime that will change the entire face of medicine int he next few years, save millions if not billions of lives, and about to go public on the stock exchange... everything suggests I havent just made the scientific discovery of a lifetime, saved the world (hopefully), but will probably be a billionaire in the next few years at this rate....
Yet here I am letting a few vile twerps on a small social media network get under my skin and hurt me... fuck them, they could only hope to do a fraction of the good I'm doing. All they want to do is lie, hurt, and tare down good people to make their own pathetic egos feel like it has some value...
I think im good, they only mattered because I let them.
Thanks. I had similar sobering thoughts as well while reading this article.
There is also a book by E. Fromm on the same topic he wrote in the distant 1941:
I vividly recall my first HP Pocket Calculator with Reverse Polish Notation I had during my undergraduate studies:
“#Freedom is normally seen as a privilege and not a reason to be afraid. But many people did fear freedom, Ms. Müller commented on the developments in Eastern Europe. The initial euphoria of finally being set free had soon worn off and evaporated, replaced in many places by fear. #Fear, she said, “is as complicated as freedom.” Adding momentum, organized fear is at the heart of all authoritarian regimes, which try to literally raise people to be afraid.”
https://www.bosch-stiftung.de/en/news/how-authoritarian-regimes-create-climate-fear
I just hope that after a century people have smartened up and the instantaneous and global news cycle on social media can make a difference in how we react to the completely natural #fear of change:
https://getpocket.com/explore/item/george-orwell-s-1940-review-of-mein-kampf
Terrific article about how the “Move fast and break things” philosophy inevitably leads to the rise of group #identity-based #totalitarian societies.
In fact, all #revolutions need a "cleanup" time to establish the "new order" and restore all the good things they have broken in the process.
https://www.noemamag.com/the-perils-of-smashing-the-past/
The majority is not like that. We all have our own quirks, but at the end I think most of us will enjoy in a nice "heated" exchange around the same table with a glass of something in their hand.
It is just that a limited number of the same individuals that don't like to be questioned, most often than not, have also the urge to tell others what (how) they should think.
In my experience, they are all sooner or later "cancelled" just as a matter natural progression of things around the table because they are boring.
From "The Socratic Way Of Questioning":
"A #definition must be both #clear and #distinct. It must express “the perfect idea" of a thing, but if we cannot have perfect clarity, we should at least have "perfect distinctness.” so that it is not mistaken for some other thing".
In other words, if you are not able to properly describe what a thing IS, try to explain what the thing ISN'T.
Very glad I found this community. Please don't stop Question Others to Teach Ourselves😀
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/59712099-the-socratic-way-of-questioning
Robert Rosen on #complexity and the emergence of a #hierarchy in #biology.
https://www.academia.edu/6576779/Rosen_and_Pattee_on_Theoretical_Biology?email_work_card=view-paper
@antlerboy
There is much more than #lust in that "black box"
https://t.co/DakXsVuqLO
Erotic framework? Looks o me like a desperate attempt to produce some traction for #Cybernetics. What's next, #cyberporn?😀
Historical introduction to #LAWS, #LANGUAGE and #LIFE
#HH_Pattee's classic papers on the #physics of #symbols, #epistemology, #quantum_measurement, #complementarity, #hierarchy_theory, and #artificial_life, with contemporary commentaries by Howard Pattee and Joanna Rączaszek-Leonardi.
https://www.academia.edu/2767702/Historical_introduction_to_LAWS_LANGUAGE_AND_LIFE
@lePetomaneAncien
No. But I sure will now.
Thanks.
Heisenberg's Levels of #Reality:
1. Things objectified independently of the knowledge process (#laws of #physics);
2. Things inseparable from the knowledge process (#measurement, #control);
3. Things created in the knowledge process (#philosophy, art, politics, religion).
The #emergent properties of #complex adaptive #systems are the product of the "bottom-up" interaction of components that maintain the system's existence and #growth which are only constrained (#controlled) by the emergent internal (structural) #rules of the system as a whole, and the limitations of its #environment niche.
There is no such thing as "#downward_causation".
"Reality is not merely a social construction, the consensus of a collectivity, or some inter-subjective agreement. It also has a trans-subjective dimension: for example, experimental data can ruin the most beautiful scientific theory."
B_Nicolescu
Transdisciplinarity[ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269520771_Transdisciplinarity_the_hidden_third_between_the_subject_and_the_object]: the hidden third, between the subject and the object
"Because our brains are future-predicting machines, it’s natural to want to avoid ambiguity. “As human beings, we crave security, and that is why all of us are intolerant of uncertainty to some extent,” writes Fox.
https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/how_to_get_comfortable_with_uncertainty_and_change
Retired #systemsengineering professional and #organizationalchange coach with decades of experience in the #military and #aerospace domains.
I'm very glad I found this Mastodon #community where we can "Question Others to Teach Ourselves". Please feel free to ask questions and argue with anything I say. Be sure I'll be doing the same. Nothing is sacred. There are no stupid questions, just BS answers.
Stay safe and be nice to others.
PJ