Show newer

Threads + Fediverse / ActivityPub?

- Threads Advertising "planned to be implemented in the future."

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg stated that monetization would not take place until the app had "hundreds of millions" of users

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threads_

The connection between Nazi-style working, German and any other modern 'high efficiency' that mostly cuts out the caring... 

Companies, bosses, work, Nazis realise you need to drop various levels of humanise to become more machine-like as output.

They could care more but that would not maximise people or work.

===============
DISCLAIMER / CLARITY:
===============
I appreciate this post can sound racist or unkind but if you focus on the care side of the equation, you can see that caring less = more efficient for various authority or chains.

vs.
types of output / money / tech advance

Like bad doctors, governments can suck more blood out of patients (peasant) by keeping them just-about alive while taking enough blood (energy / money) without killing them completely...


Bad

They could care more but that would not maximise people.

Technology is used against us more than for us.

If uncaring people allow its use,
then you have to believe it benefits them more than us. IT'S A CONCRETE HISTORICAL RULE.

The people who run it importantly don't care so it's effects are limited! (The infrastructure / BigTech we can't evolve or overthrow). So inside bubbles maybe admin care but overall it's going towards spy city (again).

falls as short as it's owners

The value of any thing or topic is valued differently between different people. 

Math fails us because it depends from writer or reader (whoever is counting or valuing things) what is a given value.... or even to give value at all to things!....

█Is an object worth 1 or 10 to you,,, to find him/him is worth...

█How much is your child worth?

█How much do you love her / him?

█Do you practice listening to your family and given them specific time each week?

This is how mathematics fails as the only tool for measurement tool (for what Government largely is used for humans and human value - because we individuals are all the measurer to our own value and have our own ways for looking at things...

All of us have very unique tastes or personalities so rather than force-standardise we can still encourage and need the uniqueness to be respected.

Even if some people can be loosely grouped - all is almost nuance and cross border variations (more than one box or genre) so almost too dangerous putting too much value and time in analysing that..

While learning is hopefully constant to accept new ideas and concepts, I think this fundamental difference means to say "be careful of labelling things or valuing when it comes to people.

🗨️ If this comment was highly worth it, please boost!


Math fails us when we individuals are all the measurer to our own value - We have our own ways for looking at many things differently... 

TLDR - Math fails us because it depends from writer or reader who's counting or valuing things what or is given value..

█Is an object worth 1 or 10 to you,,, to find him/him is worth...

█How much is your child worth?

█How much do you love her / him?

This is how mathematics fails as the only tool for measurement tool (for what Government largely is used for humans and human value - because we individuals are all the measurer to our own value and have our own ways for looking at things...

All of us have very unique tastes or personalities so rather than force-standardise we can still encourage and need the uniqueness to be respected.

Even if some people can be loosely grouped - all is almost nuance and cross border variations (more than one box or genre) so almost too dangerous putting too much value and time in analysing that..

While learning is hopefully constant to accept new ideas and concepts, I think this fundamental difference means to say "be careful of labelling things or valuing when it comes to people.

🗨️ If this comment was highly worth it, please boost!


Audio for Richard Stallman + Communities RE: "Humanising the Movement" / SpeakPipe.com for more audio feedback or interaction... 

I asked RMS about the merits of "Humanising the Movement" - primarily to allow and encourage more audio interaction for those who enjoy it - not everyone but audio messages as an outlet and expression for people and growth and improvement-as-we-go in expression that naturally happens in community practising it!

➡️ 🎤 Listen to Audio below: 🎤
bin.dembased.xyz/audio-for-rms

====================
⬇️ MORE TEXT IF INTERESTED
(BUT AUDIO IS EXPRESSES BASICS)
====================
A website can easily allow people to choose to record a message and make the process easier than email (as fans, feedback and expression of topics).
Email will still work for those that really want to Richard Stallman (for example in this case) or to anyone or who is checking on his behalf. I suggested myself to sort things with disclaimer put before that "someone else will be trusted to listen to their email and will also will be disposed of after making notes... because I have done this before and can process 100's a day and make notes / reply fast etc etc showing results and trust... but also it could be his staff or whoever taking this idea - mostly I have more time than almost all the Fediverse who have a job that takes up all their time.

Something more human is also what RMS needs from a largely disconnected / email / text-only movement he / we built up or ended up in so that can be part of something more human, more than not.

Community and Communication go together so intrinsically.

I can filter and note down various notes and make summary... from chalking up another 'thanks' email to 10 people mentioning the same thing and don't have Facebook account (RMS has only a 1 way only account on Fediverse) - so audio or more ways might be 100% better than ignoring and even being overwhelmed by emaill...

ALSO SOME "TIME" METRICS
- 5 emails = 5mins minimum (maybe 20minutes)
or
- 2 audio messages 5mins each but better understanding and better relationship in the end
(even if it's just a 1 ways audio not needed a reply)

I tried to say to RMS "you are behind on emails as you are the bottleneck and only one answering"

in 10minutes audio you often are actually better off explaining in this medium, because in audio you can say a lot more in 1 min than typing text / reading text.

I get more info sometimes and their tone and perspective where email sometimes score Near-0 for understanding "Where the fuck is this person wanting to go or wanting from me?" 10 emails can take more than 10 mins (for each writer and reader which was what was happening with me and RMS and quickly going backwards in progress and repetitive... also fragmented and had to remind him stuff...

So as audio form, if it could be made much easier to send (like 1-click like Telegram, Signal) with near-0 work (like 1 website or copying what speakpipe.com has) then we can really make progress and have variety for many types of people.

This was what my audio suggested to Richard
to check out speakpipe.com and imagine some tweaks.

Voice messages could fill up in a directory and I could filter them!

*** Stallman was only able to listen to 1min from 10mins ***

- so even though he had the audio already, he didn't want to listen onwards...
Quite terrible perhaps and but maybe this is EXACTLY THE EXAMPLE of why things don't work or limited in email-only realm.
(I did also work with him before and work was done fast / enjoyable once clear!)

He did listen to 1min so I am 'thankful' but continuing 9 more minutes audio (lol) could have creatively been done during something else even nonchalant -
so something I think could be since he doesn't get why humanising interaction and audio, even if it's one way - I wasn't saying he had to reply by audio!

He sent me reply saying he didn't see it worth listening to the rest even though he had the audio file downloaded.

So I would like to solve this / practise better and more people doing basically better than 1min!

If you listened to the audio, congrats!

WE CANNOT CONTINUE without voice or with those types that non-starters with more human stuff (is odd to write that but shows how text and computer things are now)

Even by email he was saying repetitive and time consuming 'valuing his time' but wasting it.

Most my life it feels I have found all these types of people or it's most of humanity like talking through computers - just different 'personalities' or different 'species' like cat and dog that don't understand what humanity is or needs, they are almost different animals! But practising better I think can help enjoy the right things again... rather than run away!

This audio might be a project idea for you or a Techie who can set up the same as SpeakPipe.com

All so it can be a human movement for humans !

At least 1 person or 1 setup of it as a test to see what I mean...

Because without humanisms I'm quite sure nothing works and misses the whole point and reinforced differences - and more importantly, without audio, it skips the improvement factor of "as-we-work" human voice and humanism effects - we are not improving without it in plain or 'rich' text!.

I guess most computer-heads just won't get some of these paragraphs... like a kind of cat or dog basically !

But I'm hoping 1 or 2 can be concerned with making this get in touch to make more of a HUMAN movement (which is almost all of them I think aiming to solve human things) and take care of any assumptions not said explicitly here. Just ask

AND BOOST! THANKS


Audio for Richard Stallman - my last attempt about: "Humanise the Movement" / SpeakPipe.com 

My last attempt to ask him about the merits of "Humanising the Movement" - primarily to allow and encourage more audio interaction for those who enjoy it - not everyone but audio messages as an outlet and expression for people and growth / improvement in expression in community !

➡️ 🎤 Audio download: 🎤
bin.dembased.xyz/audio-for-rms

====================
⬇️ MORE DETAIL IF INTERESTED ⬇️
(BUT SEE AUDIO FOR BASICS)
====================
A website can easily allow people to choose to record a message and make the process easier than email (as fans or many types of feedback and expression of topics).
Email will still work for those that really want to Richard Stallman (for example in this case) or to anyone or who is checking on his behalf. I suggested myself to sort things with disclaimer put before that "someone else will be trusted to listen to their email and will also will be disposed of after making notes... because I have done this before and can process 100's a day and make notes / reply fast etc etc showing results and trust... but also it could be his staff or whoever taking this idea - mostly I have more time than almost all the Fediverse who have a job that takes up all their time.

Something more human is also what RMS needs from a largely disconnected / email / text-only movement he / we built up or ended up in so that can be part of something more human, more than not.

Community and Communication go together so intrinsically.

I can filter and note down various notes and make summary... from chalking up another 'thanks' email to 10 people mentioning the same thing and don't have Facebook account (RMS has only a 1 way only account on Fediverse) - so audio or more ways might be 100% better than ignoring and even being overwhelmed by emaill...

ALSO SOME "TIME" METRICS
- 5 emails = 5mins minimum (maybe 20minutes)
or
- 2 audio messages 5mins each but better understanding and better relationship in the end
(even if it's just a 1 ways audio not needed a reply)

I tried to say to RMS "you are behind on emails as you are the bottleneck and only one answering"

in 10minutes audio you often are actually better off explaining in this medium, because in audio you can say a lot more in 1 min than typing text / reading text.

I get more info sometimes and their tone and perspective where email sometimes score Near-0 for understanding "Where the fuck is this person wanting to go or wanting from me?" 10 emails can take more than 10 mins (for each writer and reader which was what was happening with me and RMS and quickly going backwards in progress and repetitive... also fragmented and had to remind him stuff...

So as audio form, if it could be made much easier to send (like 1-click like Telegram, Signal) with near-0 work (like 1 website or copying what speakpipe.com has) then we can really make progress and have variety for many types of people.

This was what my audio suggested to Richard
to check out speakpipe.com and imagine some tweaks.

Voice messages could fill up in a directory and I could filter them!

*** Stallman was only able to listen to 1min from 10mins ***

- so even though he had the audio already, he didn't want to listen onwards...
Quite terrible perhaps and but maybe this is EXACTLY THE EXAMPLE of why things don't work or limited in email-only realm.
(I did also work with him before and work was done fast / enjoyable once clear!)

He did listen to 1min so I am 'thankful' but continuing 9 more minutes audio (lol) could have creatively been done during something else even nonchalant -
so something I think could be since he doesn't get why humanising interaction and audio, even if it's one way - I wasn't saying he had to reply by audio!

He sent me reply saying he didn't see it worth listening to the rest even though he had the audio file downloaded.

So I would like to solve this / practise better and more people doing basically better than 1min!

If you listened to the audio, congrats!

WE CANNOT CONTINUE without voice or with those types that non-starters with more human stuff (is odd to write that but shows how text and computer things are now)

Even by email he was saying repetitive and time consuming 'valuing his time' but wasting it.

Most my life it feels I have found all these types of people or it's most of humanity like talking through computers - just different 'personalities' or different 'species' like cat and dog that don't understand what humanity is or needs, they are almost different animals! But practising better I think can help enjoy the right things again... rather than run away!

This audio might be a project idea for you or a Techie who can set up the same as SpeakPipe.com

All so it can be a human movement for humans !

At least 1 person or 1 setup of it as a test to see what I mean...

Because without humanisms I'm quite sure nothing works and misses the whole point and reinforced differences - and more importantly, without audio, it skips the improvement factor of "as-we-work" human voice and humanism effects - we are not improving without it in plain or 'rich' text!.

I guess most computer-heads just won't get some of these paragraphs... like a kind of cat or dog basically !

But I'm hoping 1 or 2 can be concerned with making this get in touch to make more of a HUMAN movement (which is almost all of them I think aiming to solve human things) and take care of any assumptions not said explicitly here. Just ask

AND BOOST! THANKS


Pleading to others is a bit futile when you are almost the only one feeling how you do about life, and almost nobody else.... 

Maybe one or two people (literally) feels something partially or for a fleeting moment but overall not much, *at least not to the level of sentimentalism or dedication I seem to have* and ability to cover a lot of attempts quickly in reply.

Just too much in either or many ways. No will power or belief...

To try my best means it only rebounds incorrectly back in my face causing more harm to people from confusion or misinterpretation or defensiveness etc... (it's more misunderstood / tangential / unwanted attention or it's simply just not felt by others - rather than helpful).

It's part of life perhaps, by it is possible to bang your head on wood too easily expecting different. So being more certain somehow is the way...

Eating McDonald's fast food internet? American-style Consumerism? 

Modem speeds would fix and return our focus in a lot ways healthier.

McDonalds fast food / broadband doesn't help when we don't have better things to do and eat too much data... (therefore energy... time... and storage... components.... and so on... and demand resources = from war basically ...).

I'm just so sentimental about life...
and this song reflects that...

"Wonderwall" cover by Ryan Adams

(original artist Noel Gallagher said he wished he did song originally like this cover - Noel liked it a lot)

invidious.fdn.fr/watch?v=hbvpC

"Wonderwall" in Oasis / Fediverse storyline (interest for Each Other) + song... 

TLDR: "Because maybe, You're gonna be the one that saves me..."

To support working together.

Keeping "the wonder" between us I submit the relativity to the Oasis song.

"Wonderwall" as a terminology abd song keeps coming to mind, hence this post...

█ Wonderwall = somebody you find yourself thinking about constantly,
(many reasons and interesting topics).
Maybe someone that can help you or help save you from your predicament or work with you on something.

The human problems as what humans need to work on as a FreeSchool or whatever small business.

So I think this is how life could work in a more healthy way.

Inspired by music I listen to:
█Oasis - Wonderwall + lyrics

=================

OFFICIAL VID: invidious.fdn.fr/watch?v=6hzrD

LYRICS VID: invidious.fdn.fr/watch?v=sYffF

=================
BEST PARTS:
=================
"And all the roads we have to walk are winding
And all the lights that lead us there are blinding
There are many things that I would
Like to say to you
But I don't know how

Because maybe
You're gonna be the one that saves me
And after all
You're my wonderwall"



=================
EXTRA INFO ABOUT SONG:
=================
Noel Gallagher said about the origin of this song to NME in 1996,

After he divorced girlfriend, Meg Matthews in 2001 he said, that the song was "about an imaginary friend who's gonna come and save you from yourself".

CHANGE YOUR BUSINESS MODEL SO IT'S MOSTLY BASED ON OUR OWN FEDIVERSE PEOPLE... 🌐 :fediverse:

...AND WATCH THE FEDIVERSE WORLD BE HAPPIER / WORKING MORE AND MORE TOGETHER! 🌐 :fediverse:
🚀 BOOST PLEASE! 🌐 🚀

@freeschool

You dont need to win me over man, you're cool. I just usually dont have the the time and bandwidth to engage with you to the extent you would like, but it is nothing personal.

It's NOT just about time... *will power* is mostly what you need...

If you're *willing* to save the world, then you *will* find a way.

====================
*Will* (noun) = a fixed and persistent intent, aim or purpose

*Will* (verb) = future tense of something happening or action
====================

Don't expect anyone else to do the caring but you for yourself... 

Nobody else knows you or respects you as you do for yourself.

for regularly as you go along bit by bit

Tech is also directly responsible for people working and living without the human stuff involved... 

People in Tech are also responsible for the non-human stuff happening as they are not contributing or using that while they work (or indeed find somewhere else that does)...

You could say "people doing all the same-same science/tech stuff is directly responsible for people feeling and living without the human consideration stuff".


to of not just

Not " Just doing my ! " given by who don't usually care or pay willingly for any humanisms lol - Caring is way down the list and only for parasitising money and charging them more for everything!

So don't expect anyone else to do the caring but you.

If you have to make money then consider a kind of therapy as a business - where you talk but it goes towards something put back in between all therapy session and between all therapists and clients..

WE CAN FIND & CREATE CHANGE
together organically and individually.

"Machines end up commanding us without care..."

- 2024 <---a year that is almost futurist and manga as a year number

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.