I found my answer, see this post for details:
After some research I found a few names used for this in the industry. It is called an "Eye bar", a "Shatner light" or, "Kirk light". Apparently It originated in classic black and white films. I cant verify this but it seems it was either first done or made popular by the 1931 Dracula film (image attached) which at least 3 black and white remakes all used the same Eye bar lighting. It then started to be used in other Genres and films including Star Trek the original series where it was used extensively for Kirk (images attached), thus the name Kirk/Shatner light. It was also used in the Harry Potter movies at least once.
As mentioned in the OP it was so common it was used as a running joke in the Addam's Family films anytime Morticia was in a shot (see the original post for an example).
@freemo motived because it's meant to inspire emotional motivation as if the light was a natural catch from the sun
@freemo ive always called that motivated lighting. take one of the key lights (usually pepper lights) and close down the barn doors and add boards to the sides until you get the correct effect. super distinct, super weird looking. not that common.
Anyone know the name of the lighting technique used quite often in classic films, particularly noir filrms, where they would shine a beam of light across an actors eyes?
They did it as a running joke in the Addams family films where anytime Morticia's face is shown it is always in this noir style. for the life of me I cant find a proper name for it.
Side note there are two very similarly related lighting terms. First is "catch light" where the reflection of lights and objects in a persons eyes are noticeable and pronounced. The other is Chiaroscuro which is any sort of lighting where the dynamic range is cranked up so there is high contrast between light and dark in an image.
Attached is an example.
#movie #movies #film #photography #lighting #noir #classicfilms
Interesting fact of the day. The very first internet connection consisting of 3 interconnected nodes was in fact WiFi... well, not wifi but radio/wireless. It was implemented as a mobile ad-hoc access point equipped in a van with the first 3-way network occurring in 1977.
That awkward moment when humans first realized that the god and angels they have been worshiping for almost 2000 years are actually aliens from outer space. #mormon
as promised my totally incomplete take on multidimensional iterators
@hans_w Just FYI ever since you moved to friendica half the times your server gives an error when I try to respond to you and most people int he fediverse struggle to interact with friendica servers.. its very buggy in terms of the activity pub standard to the point that most of the time people cant even tell you they are having problems.
I have nothing against friendica but outside of other friendica servers it borderlines on non-functional sadly with little hope of being fixed.
Its so buggy I usually wont even follow someone on friendica because ill just get server errors from them all the time. You are the only person i make an exception for.
Interesting fact of the day: A chimpanzee is about 1.3x to 1.5x stronger than humans when it comes to pulling, jumping, and lifting with the legs in general. However when it comes to physical strength in terms of **pushing** humans are significantly stronger than chimps. Similarly while our legs arent as strong in terms of explosive power (jumping) we are many times better at endurance (using our leg muscles for longer). A human can cover a much farther distance on foot than a chimp could.
So the general factoids about chimps being stronger then us are very misleading. They are simply adapted to be stronger at the sorts of tasks they are suited for and weaker in others, while humans are stronger than a chimp in other ways.
#Science #STEM #Biology #zoology #monkey #chimp #ape #chimpanzee @Science
By the way to make some limited attempt at actually giving you a useful answer. The only site I know that comes close to listing common decompositions consistently and in a sorta data formated way rather than wikipedia which is more of a teaching tool then I only know of one.
That would be PubChem, which basically lists almost every chemical imaginable, and all of its technical properties in a consistent and well laid out way. It almost always has a section on composition that lists several of the most common (though s we discussed not all) decomposition routes.|
I use PubChem almost every day when im doing chemistry and its really the only place that has anywhere near or approach an exhaustive list. I usually use it for figuring out what something is soluble in and what class of reactions it works well in.
Here is the PubChem page for hydrogen peroxide linking directly to its decomposition section as an example. The cool thing is I've found information on chemicals that google barely returns hits on and for which wikipedia pages dont even exist:
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Hydrogen-peroxide#section=Decomposition
@lucifargundam I know of no such site, not the way you want it, and im not sure such thing could really exist. Bear in mind, however, I'm far from an expert in chemistry, at best its a hobby for me..
So the issue I see here is that "decomposition" just means a chemical breaks down into constuent parts in some way and tends to imply there is no rearrangement of its parts with some reaction with another chemical. This is all fine and good however the results of decomposition depend greatly on the circumstances.
For example consider there are really several routes to decomposition: catalytic, UV break down, heat, electrolysis. Each one of these routes will usually produce entierly different decomposition products. Even then within a specific route the decomposition product can be almost anything as you tweak parameters, the temperature, frequency of UV, the catalyst chosen, as well as the pressure and even concentration of the reaction vessel will all have a huge effect. If any solvents are involved to facilitate the reaction (as would be the case with catalytic reactions usually) would also have a huge effect.
Take a really simple example, hydrogen peroxide which is just four atoms, two hydrogen, two oxygen. heat it up a little bit or use a catalyst and youll wind up with water and oxygen. Heat it up a great deal (as would also be the case with water alone) and it will decompose down to H2 and O2 separately (which is why if firemen try to put out extremely hot fires like magnesium fires with water it will cause explosions). Heat it up even more and you get elemental H and O separately rather than their diatomic form.
Now in the case of H2O2 there really arent too many break down options simply because you only have 2 different atoms so they can only combine in a limited number of ways. But we have literally just covered every single combination of H and O that can exist by describing all the decomposition routes of H2O2 via heating alone. Doable for such a simple molecule but for more complex molecules describing every route exhaustively becomes impossible.
The best you could hope for from such a database/site would be for it to describe a very limited set of common decompositions. For example it might just limit decomposition to various temperatures and what the most predominate results are and leave off the small % decomposition by products. But the cut off would be arbitrary in both the choice of temperature and the choice of % needed to list it as a decomposition.
For example pure water at room temperature will instantly "decompose" (we dont call this decomposition really) into H+ and OH- ions in very small concentrations. Most of the time its so small we ignore this even though some H+ ions will randomly neutralize and form H2, but the rate and concentration at which that happens is so small as to be pointless to think of it as existing at all. So in any reasonable % cut off we would lnot describe that as a natural decomposition at room temperature. But none the less it is there.
So yea long story short I dont think you will find what you are after. Best you might fine is sources like wikipedia that describe some very common decompositions and is no where near comprehensive.
@freemo
*sigh*
@freemo
I have birthday tomorrow ![]()
Jeffrey Phillips Freeman
Innovator & Entrepreneur in Machine Learning, Evolutionary Computing & Big Data. Avid SCUBA diver, Open-source developer, HAM radio operator, astrophotographer, and anything nerdy.
Born and raised in Philadelphia, PA, USA, currently living in Utrecht, Netherlands, USA, and Thailand. Was also living in Israel, but left.
Pronouns: Sir / Mister
(Above pronouns are not intended to mock, i will respect any persons pronouns and only wish pronouns to show respect be used with me as well. These are called neopronouns, see an example of the word "frog" used as a neopronoun here: http://tinyurl.com/44hhej89 )
A proud member of the Penobscot Native American tribe, as well as a Mayflower passenger descendant. I sometimes post about my genealogical history.
My stance on various issues:
Education: Free to PhD, tax paid
Abortion: Protected, tax paid, limited time-frame
Welfare: Yes, no one should starve
UBI: No, use welfare
Racism: is real
Guns: Shall not be infringed
LGBT+/minorities: Support
Pronouns: Will respect
Trump: Moron, evil
Biden: Senile, racist
Police: ACAB
Drugs: Fully legal, no prescriptions needed
GPG/PGP Fingerprint: 8B23 64CD 2403 6DCB 7531 01D0 052D DA8E 0506 CBCE