Show newer

Let's see... apparently, putting in a bunch of tags of things that interest me is going to make it easier for other people who share those interests to run across me.

Alright, then. Let's see...










...that should be enough for the moment, I guess.

So. This will be my first mastodon post.

Whatever else I do, this will always be at the top of my timeline. However things change.

I should probably make it somehow interesting, or timelessly relevant.

But there is such a thing as overthinking things. A poor first post is very ignorable, and I don't want analysis paralysis to prevent me from ever posting anything at all.

So... overthought first post done, I guess.

@carlostomas @freemo

...it's certainly an approach worth looking at.

I've only looked at the overview of the proof, but there is one thing that occurs to me; and tht is that, when using the distance argument (i.e. showing that numbers have a common factor with each other, and that factor is not present in the number sought as a sum) it is *not* required that *all* the terms have the same factor.

To illustrate this, let us assume a set of N numbers, all of which are multiples of three (some may be negative). To this set of numbers, let us add the number 1, which is not a multiple of three. We now have a set of N+1 numbers, all but one of which are multiples of three; and there is no subset of these numbers which can possibly add up to 20. So we can use distance for identification of multiple subset sums even when some elements of the sum do not share a common factor.

If that common factor is 3, then we can have at most one number which does not share the common factor. However, for larger common factors, the number that we can have which do not share that factor becomes larger; with a common factor of 5, we can have at least three numbers in the set which do not share the common factor and yet still leave certain totals impossible to reach.

I'm not entirely sure how this applies to the subset problem in a general sense.

to be clear, I am refering to exit polls not actual counts which come later.

Woat apparently the @QOTO group had a nice little boost of membership last night. Something like 25 new users joined the group.

Awesome to see the groups taking off, welcome!

Who are you voting for in the election?

Am i the only one who tried the Konami Cheat code first when they entered the voting booth? Up up down down left right left right select select start... nope, didnt work.

@freemo other: user override for admin-imposed blocks/suspends/mutes/silences

Today is Vim's birthday!

It's been 29 years since Bram Moolenaar gave Vim it's first public release in 1991, November 2nd. After 8 major releases and a 9th in consideration, Vim has come a long way.

Take a chance to show your appreciation for the greatest text editor of all time!

What should QOTO's next feature be?

@QOTO

If you moderate one of the groups at groups.qoto.org here is one useful tip.

You can add posts to the group by manually boosting them. Similarly posts made directly from the group account wont show in the group, if you wish for it to show in the group you must immediately boost your own post.

Remember people, if we learned anything from the last election its that if you don't vote for the female candidate you are sexist.

Dont be sexist, vote Jo Jorgenson! :)

@freemo @arteteco This one seems active this year: votepact.org

Though you have to find your own person to pair up with.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.