@rlamacraft Well, we check for the UK and South-African variants here. And I think we check for mutations as well. Maybe it just so happens that the UK and SA areas have a real mutation going on that actually made a difference (easier to spread in this case)?
@OldManSteiner Damn, you made me look. I think he does, though it's very difficult to see in some pictures.
@rlamacraft That is a good question. I think it is mostly that people tend to blame the Chinese for this by calling it the Chinavirus or Chinese coronavirus. Asians or Asian-looking people have been assaulted at the start of the pandemic for this. Not sure if that's still the case, probably is. There's still a squabble about the origin of the virus.
The British variant is a variation of an existing virus, so that would seem to be a subtle difference there.
I still blame the Brits, of course. 😋
@thatbrickster Thanks! Learning something here. Going to read the sites.
I am probably what one would call a 'flexitarian', I've read about that term before. There are days that I don't eat meat (though I cannot guarantee it is vegan), and days where I do eat meat.
A fair amount of my friends are vegetarian. I am not sure if there are vegans among them.
@thatbrickster So, would it also apply to stuff like uh.. lipsticks with that definition? It sounds kind of weird to label something that you can't eat 'vegan', is that term that widely used?
@thatbrickster Aha. Alright, thanks for the clarification. So I probably can expect to see 'vegan' more often now, where I'd have expected 'vegetarian'?
@thatbrickster Oh? I must've missed the development here, since I'm not really following this up close. So what's that interpretation like now?
@thatbrickster Huh, that seems to be quite a difference. I mean, why specifically vegan instead of vegetarian?
@mur2501 Aw.
And aw. ![]()
@Kovaelin As opposed to the princess being in another castle?
That'd be a nicer alternative, yeah.
I absolutely love Dark Reader. Teams' built in editors hurt my eyes because of all the brightness. But hey, they allow me to open the document in the browser! Dark Reader to the rescue!
https://darkreader.org
@freemo
The problem is that I'll just have to believe you on your word that guns would've improved our numbers, and that removing guns would've made American numbers look even worse.
From the examples you've given, it sounds like we'd better put more effort in mental health access and all that other stuff instead. That sounds much more fruitful in the long term.
Like you said before, we obviously disagree. I am actually getting weary and would like to head to bed soon since it's near midnight here.
Agree to disagree?
@freemo
That's exactly it. You are convinced that it would be less with responsible gun ownership.
Why can't USA prove the same by having lower average crime statistics for the same crimes right now? They've got the guns, surely the rape incidence should be a lot less than my country?
Let's grab this link, I hope it is official enough:
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/rape-statistics-by-country
Rape rate in NL is 9.20 and DE is 9.40. Rape rate in USA is 27.30, but man, it got the guns.
What strikes me as funny is that the Scandinavic countries have a higher rape rate than central Europe... while gun ownership is a bit more easy over there. Surprised me a bit. Belgium's fucking scary as well, despite that they also seem to have more easy gun laws than we do.
So, it doesn't seem to be a guarantee at all. I do not agree with your conviction that responsible gun ownership would've prevented all this. Who ensures that only the responsible ones own them? If after decades of experience USA can't manage this, why would we even think of entering this rabbit hole?
@freemo
I think I've read about the incident in that church before. In a country that's already so infused with firearms, it is a good thing to own one to prevent such situations from escalating. Because to de-arm the American civilians (and criminals) at this point is pretty much impossible.
Europe, however, is a totally different beast. Especially in the urban areas. To introduce guns there like USA has would not improve it, of that I am certain.
Europe is basically almost a gigantic no-gun zone. Yet we don't really seem to have criminals waltzing around with guns in abundance. Sure, knives are a possibility. But knives are around aplenty, so pretty easy to get. And if guns were legal, they'd get crafty and 'acquire' guns instead.
So long the average statistics show that USA is not in better shape regarding violent cases (murder, rape, etc) than my country, I am not feeling terribly inclined to vote for easier gun laws here. Even though the average American citizen is able to defend themselves, apparently it is not really making society that much safer.
There will always be extreme cases, like terrorism. But that's exactly it, an extreme case. Even in USA it's hard to fight this, despite their gun laws.
@freemo @servant_of_the_anime_avatars
Point taken about the martial arts. I'll retract that statement, that was a good reasoning and naive of me.
But you're talking about the viewpoint where it is a criminal who is not allowed guns. In the other debate I wasn't talking about this viewpoint at all. What if they do own a gun legally?
(Also, if every non-criminal can get guns, then criminals would be more likely to be able to get guns as well. In a society where guns are abundant, they can be stolen and sold off to criminals easier.)
So if the woman in Germany was allowed a gun.. who's to guarantee that those rapists weren't carrying a gun either? Especially with those intentions they'd prepare accordingly. Instead of a knife, they might actually have put her at gunpoint.
@freemo @servant_of_the_anime_avatars
"Guns are the great equalizer."
I thought it was about freedom, not a 'level playing field'.
Guess the argument I had the other day wasn't quite 100% correct. Everybody needs guns, apparently, in order to be able to defend themselves, or to even live normally at all.
And it is terrible what happened to that woman in Germany. But would the outcome really be that different if they had guns? There could be deaths, and it might not even be the culprits who died. We don't know, so it's pure speculation at this point. It is also not a common occorence, thankfully.
Go learn martial arts if you're seriously concerned about your well-being. That's allowed.
@freemo Those wars right now are not in my country, and I sincerely hope that's going to stay this way. 'Prepare for peace, build an army', civilians are not armies. You might think your militia is, because of your constitution, but we don't.
We send troops over the world as support to try to help resolve some of those wars. Our army is geared to try to stabilize regions and de-escalate situations.
Might bigger armies be needed, we still have conscription in our laws. It is merely put on hold, but it can be put back in use any time. The government decided having professionals was the way to go, so our army is full of trained people which can be used in any situation.
I will have to trust my government. I do trust my government. It probably helps that a chance of a type like that orange guy getting in office and deciding everything is extremely slim.
@servant_of_the_anime_avatars That is not true. You have the right to defend yourself. Just not with a firearm here.
Main account is now on @trinsec
I've resigned as moderator on Qoto.org since 29-aug-2023.
This one is now a backup account, my activities on Qoto will be low.
---
Used to be on another mastodon server regularly, but it's been inaccessible since November 2020. So I've decided to join Qoto instead! I like the features this server has to offer.
Huffi-Muffi-Guffi! | Deaf | Gamer | Minecraft | Steam | Coder | Cats | StarTrek (not reboot) | Firefly | LEGO | Science (& Fiction) | Logic | #nobot | #fedi22 | Awesome 😎 | 🇳🇱
I'm not an ass, I have AS(S). I'm just a blunt autist.